SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 248641

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE V. V. KANKANWADIHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
VIJAY LAXMAN PATIL AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
APPLN/3297/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vijay B. Patil
For the Respondents: S.A. Gaikwad, N.S. Shah

Abetment of suicide requires proof of clear mens rea, positive instigation, and a close proximate nexus between the accused's acts and the act of suicide. Long-standing neighborhood disputes or confrontational quarrels, without evidence of specific intent to drive the victim to death, do not constitute abetment.

Headnote:(A) The Penal Code - Sections 306, 354, 448, 143, 147, 323, 504, 506, 427 read with 34 - The Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 482 - Powers to quash proceedings where allegations fail to disclose an offence or result in abuse of law.

(B) Abetment to suicide - Essential ingredients of Section 306 - Requirement of mens rea and clear instigation - Active or direct act must be proximate to the suicide - Mere confrontational quarrels or social discord do not equate to instigation - Necessity of establishing a chain of causation. (Paras 16-19)

(C) Outraging Modesty - Section 354 - Requires specific application of criminal force with intent to outrage modesty - Absence of particulars regarding force or intent renders the charge unsustainable. (Paras 23-25)

(D) Criminal Intimidation - Section 506 - Requires specific allegation of a threat with intent to cause alarm - Vague statement of threat in a complaint is insufficient. (Para 27)

Facts of the case:
A criminal complaint was lodged alleging that the deceased face continuous humiliation, harassment, and physical altercations from neighbors. It was claimed that these actions, which continued for a prolonged period, eventually drove the deceased to commit suicide. The applicants filed a motion to quash the proceedings, arguing that the allegations did not disclose the necessary elements for the offences charged and that the litigation was an abuse of process.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the record revealed only recurring neighborhood quarrels and verbal disputes, which are common incidents of social life. There was a significant time gap between the last alleged altercation and the date of the suicide, breaking the required chain of causation. The court also expressed doubt regarding the reliability of the suicide note and noted that key charges regarding criminal force and intimidation lacked the specific details, time, or circumstances necessary to justify a trial.

Issues: The central issue was whether the allegations in the complaint established the essential ingredients of the criminal offences charged, particularly abetment to suicide, and whether continuing the prosecution would constitute an abuse of the court's process.

Ratio Decidendi: To establish abetment, the prosecution must show a proximate prior act directly linking the accused's conduct to the victim’s suicide. Without a clear demonstration of mens rea and an intention to provoke the extreme act, evidence of mere social friction or confrontational behavior is insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirements under the penal code.

Result: Criminal application allowed; the impugned criminal proceedings stand quashed.

2025:BHC-AUG:25135-DB

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3297 OF 2024

1. Vijay Laxman Patil,

Age: 41 years, Occu.: Driver

2. Mohini Vijay Patil,

Age: 35 years, Occu.: Household,

Both R/o. Village Kedi Pra. Ja,

Tal. Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon. … Applicants

Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra,

Through its Amalner Police Station, Amalner, Tal. Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon

2. Satish Morchand Patil,

Age: 31 years, Occu: Service,

R/o. Gut No. 176/177, Ganesh Nagar,

Talwade, Pune. … Respondents

......

Mr. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for Applicants

Mr. S.A. Gaikwad, APP for Respondent No.1 – State

Mr. N.S. Shah, Advocate for Respondent No.2

......

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND

HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATED : 03 SEPTEMBER, 2025

JUDGMENT [Per Hiten S. Venegavkar]:-

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the matter is

taken up for final hearing at the admission stage.

{2}

2. The present applicants are arraigned as accused Nos. 5 and 6, respectively, in C.R. No. 05 of 2021 dated 06.01.2021, registered with Amalner Police Station, Taluka Amalner, District Jalgaon, for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 354, 448, 143, 323, 504, 506, and 427 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC'). The applicants invokes inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the 'Cr.P.C.'), seeking quashing of aforesaid FIR along with charge-sheet and further consequential proceedings is Sessions Case No.08 of 2022, pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Amalner, District Jalgaon.

FACTUAL MARTRIX :

3. FIR No. 05 of 2021 was registered at the instance of one Satish Morchand Patil, the son of the deceased, Ushabai Morchand Patil. It is alleged that the Ushabai was residing alone in her house at village Khedi (Khurd). Since February 2020, her neighbours, namely (1) Bhagwan Pandit Patil, (2) Jyerndbai Bhagwan Patil, (3) Kamlesh Bhagwan Patil, (4) Amol Bhagwan Patil, (5) Vijay Laxman Patil, and (6) Mohini Vijay Patil, who are also related to the complainant, has been harassing Ushabai. On the occasion of some religious function in the house of Bhagwan Pandit Patil, Ushabai had come to the Amalner at {3}

Market for marketing. After completing the shopping, Ushabai returned to her house in the village and found that an offering (Naivedya) to god had been placed beneath the Peepal tree in front of her house. Ushabai, therefore questioned Kamlesh Bhagwan Patil as to why they have placed the offering at such a place wharve dog have spread it all over and likely to come under the feet of passersby. It is alleged that the accused persons got angry and started assaulting Usahabai with kicks and fist blows and were also hurling abuses. The Ushabai immediately informed the complainant about the incident over the phone. The aforesaid incident was also reported to Amalner Police Station by Ushabai. When the accessed persons came to know about the said complaint, they also filed separate complaint against Ushabai. During the enquiry complaints, both the parties have summoned by Police. Parties arrived at a compromise and the complaints were resolved. It is further alleged that, in the month of April 2020, while Ushabai was filling water from public tap, she informed the neighbouring residents about the alleged incident of assault and abuse. Hearing the said talk, it is alleged then accused again gave abuses to deceased and threatened her to assault by saying that, ‘nobody can do anything to us’. It is alleged that, at that time also, she was assaulted and abused. The aforesaid incident was also informed by Ushaba to her daughter Smita Umesh Baviskar and Durga Dinesh Patil on phone. It is further alleged that the informant {4}

told the deceased that there is lockdown all over due to corona and he is unable to come; and therefore, if any legal action is required to be take

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top