SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 248644

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARIHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE
SANTOSH BALARAM KHARKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


2025:BHC-AS:46519-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 730 OF 2019

Santosh Balaram Kharkar Age :- Adult, Occu : Tailor

R/o. PutubaichaPada,

Taluka :Alibag, Dist:- Raigad. … Appellant

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra Revdanda Police Station,

Alibag, Dist.Raigad. … Respondent

_______________________________________

Mr. Aditya Bapat for Appellant Appointed by Legal Aid Committee.

Mr. Shreekant V. Gavand, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.

_______________________________________

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND

RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.

DATE : 10th September, 2025.

JUDGMENT. : (Per : A.S. Gadkari, J.)

1) Appellant has impugned Judgment and Order dated 11th January, 2019, passed by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Raigad- Alibag, in Sessions Case No.98 of 2016, convicting him under Sections 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6

months.

1.1) By the same Judgment, the Appellant is acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 504 of the IPC.

2) Heard Mr.Bapat, learn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top