SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 92

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR CHANDRABHAN MOREHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
STATE OF MAHA – Appellant
Versus
NANDKUMAR MARUTI CHAVAN and ORS – Respondent


2026:BHC-AUG:2430-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 302 OF 2003 The State of Maharashtra ... Appellant Through Virgaon Police Station, (Ori.

Tq. Vaijapur, Dist. Aurangabad Complainant)

VERSUS

1. Nandkumar s/o Maruti Chavan Age 29 years, Occu: Nil R/o Bhagur Tq. Vaijapur Dist. Aurangabad

2. Vijay s/o Maruti Chavan ... Respondents Age 30 years, Occu: Agri. (Orig. Accused)

R/o As above

3. Sunanda s/o Vijay Chavan Age 25 years, Occu: Agril.

R/o As above

4. Parigabai w/o Chandrabhan Mohite, Age 35 years, Occu: Household R/o Ayodhyanagar, Aurangabad

5. Sunil s/o Parshuram Avhale, AGe 28 years, Occu: Service R/o As above Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, Addl. PP for the Appellant-State Mr. Niesh S. Ghanekar, Advocate for the Respondents-accused CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &

Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

RESERVED ON : 02.12.2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 21.01.2026 JUDGMENT (Per: Y. G. Khobragade, J.)

1. By the present appeal under Section 378(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the prosecution takes exception to the judgment and order dated 10.01.2003 passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 224 of 2000, whereby, the respondents/accus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top