HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALEHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
ISHTIYAQUE ASLAM KHAN – Appellant
Versus
DCB BANK – Respondent
2026:BHC-OS:1603-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally s P i U gn R e T d I by ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PURTI PRASAD PRASADPARAB PARAB Date:
2026.01.21
16:10:47 +0530 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 21712 OF 2025 Ishtiyaque Aslam Khan …Petitioner Versus DCB Bank and Ors. …Respondents _______
Mr. Aseem Naphade i/b Mr. Rajendra Rathod for the Petitioner.
Mr. Shashank Fadia for Respondent No.1.
Mr. R.B. Mungekar a/w Mr. Sudhanshu Sawant for Respondent Nos. 2 and
3.
_______
CORAM: MANISH PITALE &
SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
DATE: 20th JANUARY 2026.
ORDER :
1. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.
2. The Petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 26th June 2025 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (DRAT, Mumbai). By the impugned order the DRAT, Mumbai has directed the Petitioner to deposit 40% of an amount claimed by Respondent No.1/Bank as amount due from the borrowers, i.e., Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, as a precondition for entertaining the Appeal filed by the Petitioner against rejection of interim reliefs by the DRT, Mumbai, in a Securitization Application filed on behalf of the Petitioner.
3. The impugned order records that in the event the Petitioner fails to depo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.