SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 115

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALEHON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
RAMESH DADA KALEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. – Respondent


2026:BHC-AS:2309-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1133 OF 2023 Ramesh Dada Kalel … Appellant vs.

The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents Mr. Tapan Thatte a/w. Mr. Vivek Arote and Mr. Akshay Dingale, i/b.

Mr.Dayanand Mane for appellant.

Dr. Dhanalakshmi S. Krishnaiyer, APP for respondent No.1-State.

Ms. P. S. Potdar (appointed through legal aid) for respondent No.2.

CORAM : MANISH PITALE &

MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ RESERVED ON: 16th DECEMBER, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 19th JANUARY, 2026 JUDGMENT: (Per Justice Manish Pitale, J):

. The appellant is aggrieved by judgment and order dated 29.08.2023 passed by the Court of Extra Joint District and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel-Raigad (hereinafter referred to as the Trial Court). By the said judgment and order, the appellant is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for remainder of life under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and to pay fine of ₹ 50,000, in default of which he shall undergo additional rigorous imprisonment of one month.

2. The challenge to the impugned judgment and order on behalf of the appellant, ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top