SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 170

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MAKARAND SUBHASH KARNIKHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
BHAGYASHRI PRAMOD THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent


2026:BHC-AS:2908-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 4582 of 2010 Bhagyashri Pramod Thakur … Petitioner V/s.

State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents. Mr. R.K.Mendadkar a/w. Priyanka Shaw, Jayshree Mendadkar, Siddhant Sawai, Jagdish Kawale, Prajakta Pashtre Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. N.C.Walimbe Addl. G.P. a/w. Mr. V.S.Naimbalkar, AGP for the Respondents-State.

Mr. D.R.Kawale for BMC present.

CORAM : M.S. KARNIK &

S.M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 14th January 2026.

Oral Judgment (Per M.S. Karnik, J) :

Heard Mr. Mendadkar, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Walimbe, the learned AGP appearing for the Digitally signed by LATA LATA SUNIL SUNIL PANJWANI State.

PANJWANIDate:

2026.01.21

+0530

2. The Petitioner's caste claim as belonging to Thakur Scheduled

tribe is invalidated by the Scrutiny Committee.

3. Our attention is invited to order dated 12th December 2025

passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

4. Brief background of the matter is as follows: The rejection of the caste claim of the Petitioner by the Caste Scrutiny Committee was challenged by the Petitioner by filing a Writ Petition before this Court, which came to be dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top