SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 200

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALEHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
JYOTI BALIRAM THORAT – Respondent


2026:BHC-OS:2649-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 19414 OF 2024 Jyoti Baliram Thorat and others … Petitioners vs.

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority and others … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (LODGING) NO. 25234 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 19414 OF 2024 Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority … Applicant/Resp. No.1 In the matter between:

Jyoti Baliram Thorat and others … Petitioners vs.

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority and others … Respondents Ms. Neeta Karnik, Senior Advocate, a/w. Mr. Sagar Kursija for petitioners.

Mr. G. S. Hegde, Senior Advocate, a/w. Ms. Pinky M. Bhansali for respondent No.1-MMRDA.

Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. GP a/w. Ms. Gaurangi Patil, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3-State.

CORAM : MANISH PITALE &

SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ RESERVED ON: 23rd JANUARY, 2026 PRONOUNCED ON: 30th JANUARY, 2026 ORDER: (Per Justice Manish Pitale):

. The question that arises for consideration in this petition is as to whether respondent No.3-competent authority constituted under the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top