HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
SHIVAJI GOPAL KURHADE – Appellant
Versus
RAMCHANDRA GOPAL KURHADE AND OTHERS – Respondent
IA/6796/2024
##PAGE1##
2026:BHC-AS:4170
Sumedh 18-asao-229-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 229 OF 2024
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6796 OF 2024
Shivaji Gopal Kurhade ]
Age: 72, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
Residing at H.No.1951, Kurhade Ali ]
Aalndi Devachi Tal-Khed Dist- Pune ]…Appellant
(Original Plaintiff)
V/s.
1. Ramchandra Gopal Kurhade ]
Age: 72, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
2. Vilas Gopal Kurhade ]
Age: 62, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
3. Yogendra Gopal Kurhade ]
Age: 56, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
4. Shankarrao Gopal Kurhade ]
Age: 52, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
5. Vimal Gopal Kurhade ]
Age: 85, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
6. Sachin Ramchandra Kurhade ]
Age: 38, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
7. Amol Ramchandra Kurhade ]
Age: 35, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
8. Vishal Vilas Kurhade ]
Age: 33, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
9. Viraj Vilas Kurhade ]
Age: 31, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
Digitally
signed by
SUMEDH
SUMEDH NAMDEO
NAMDEO SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
2026.01.28
18:15:43
+0530
::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2026 07:51:00 :::
##PAGE2##Sumedh 18-asao-229-2024.doc
10. Gopal Yogendra Kurhade ]
Age: 24, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
11. Chaitanya Shankarrao Kurhade ]
Age: 22, Occ- Agriculturalist ]
All R/at- House No. 808/2, ]
Laxminarayan Building, Behind ]
Santoshimata Temple Aalndi ]
Devachi Tal-Khed Dist- Pune ]…Respondents
(Original Defendants)
______________________________________
Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud i/by Adv. Samay Pawar for Appellant.
Mr. J.D. Khairnar a/w. Adv. Vikas Shivarkar for Respondent No. 1,
6 and 7.
Mr. Laxmikant N. Shrimangale a/w. Adv. Ambadas N.
Shrimangale, Adv. Vithal Shrimangale for Respondent No. 2, 3, 8 to
10.
_____________________________________________
CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J.
RESERVED ON : 6TH JANUARY 2026.
PRONOUNCED ON : 28TH JANUARY 2026.
JUDGMENT:
1) By the present Appeal, the Appellant/Orig. Plaintiff
challenges the order dated 1st February 2024 ("impugned order"),
passed by the Ad-hoc District Judge-1, Khed- Rajgurunagar,
District-Pune ("the Appellate Court") in Regular Civil Appeal No.
19 of 2020 arising out of Special Civil Suit No. 211 of 2014 ("Suit").
By the impugned order, the Appellate Court set aside the partial
Decree for partition dated 2nd January 2020 passed by the Joint
Civil Judge, Senior Division, Khed- Rajgurunagar, Dist.-Pune ("the
Trial Court"), partly in favour of the Plaintiff and remanded the
::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2026 07:51:00 :::
##PAGE3##Sumedh 18-asao-229-2024.doc
Suit to the Trial Court for fresh adjudication on re-framed issues.
2) The short but significant question that arises for
consideration in the present Appeal is whether the Ld. Appellate
Court was justified in remanding the Suit for fresh adjudication on
re-framed issues, including an additional issue of limitation,
without considering the evidence already led by the parties on
record.
BRIEF FACTS
3) The Appellant had instituted Special Civil Suit No. 211 of
2014 (originally Special Civil Suit No. 248 of 2012) seeking
partition and separate possession of ancestral and joint family
properties described in Schedules A to E, recovery of the Appellant
share in rental income from 2009 to 2012, and a decree of
permanent injunction. The Appellant claims a 1/6th share in the
joint family properties as the son of late Gopal Kurhade through
his first wife, whereas Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are the sons of the
said deceased through Respondent No. 5, his second wife. The Suit
came to be filed upon the Appellant acquiring knowledge that
Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 were attempting to alienate the suit
properties to his exclusion.
4) The Respondents contested the Suit, inter alia, on the ground
of limitation, alleging an oral partition in 1980 during the lifetime
of the deceased, and further contended that the properties
::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2026 07:51:00 :::
##PAGE4##Sumedh 18-asao-229-2024.doc
described in Schedules D and E were their self-acquired properties.
5) The Trial Court, by judgement and decree dated 2nd January
2020, pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.