Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Somasekhar Sundaresan, J
Gavit Gulabsing Suka – Appellant
Versus
Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha (Kolhapur) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition taken up for final hearing by consent. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of probationary teacher's termination over messaging complaints. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments on violation of natural justice and statutory deemed permanency. (Para 6) |
| 4. statutory probation rules and reasonable opinion requirement under meps act. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. zero-tolerance termination valid on admitted unsatisfactory behaviour of probationer. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. precedents distinguished; misconduct allegations require proven foundation for punitive action. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. termination power exercisable during full probation period before deemed confirmation. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 8. petition dismissed; impugned termination order upheld without interference. (Para 40 , 41) |
ORAL JUDGEMENT:
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, taken up for final hearing.
Context and Factual Background:
2. This Petition impugns a Judgement passed by the Learned School Tribunal, Mumbai in Appeal No. 59 of 2023 dated August 20, 2024 (“Impugned Judgement”) dismissi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
