SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 248960

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
JANATA ENTERPRISES AND ORS – Respondent


2025:BHC-AS:50182 Arjun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.233 OF 2016 ARJUN VITTHAL The State of Maharashtra …Applicant KUDHEKAR Versus Digitally signed by Janata Enterprises & Ors. …Respondents ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2025.11.20

22:53:27 +0530 _______________________________________________________________

Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP for the Applicant-State of Maharashtra.

Mr. Sharad S. Suryawanshi a/w Ranjit Hatkar i/b Pol Legal Juris, for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.

_______________________________________________________________

CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 20 NOVEMBER 2025 P.C.:

1. Heard Mr. Karmakar, learned APP, for the Applicant-State of Maharashtra and Mr. Suryawanshi, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. By the present Criminal Revision Application, the challenge is to the legality and validity of the Order dated 6th January 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali Division, Dindoshi, Mumbai in Criminal Appeal No.111 of 2013.

3. The brief facts are set out in Paragraph Nos.2 and 3 of the impugned Order dated 6th January 2014. The same read as under :-

“2. Briefly state

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top