HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
JANATA ENTERPRISES AND ORS – Respondent
2025:BHC-AS:50182 Arjun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.233 OF 2016 ARJUN VITTHAL The State of Maharashtra …Applicant KUDHEKAR Versus Digitally signed by Janata Enterprises & Ors. …Respondents ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2025.11.20
22:53:27 +0530 _______________________________________________________________
Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP for the Applicant-State of Maharashtra.
Mr. Sharad S. Suryawanshi a/w Ranjit Hatkar i/b Pol Legal Juris, for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
_______________________________________________________________
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED: 20 NOVEMBER 2025 P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Karmakar, learned APP, for the Applicant-State of Maharashtra and Mr. Suryawanshi, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
2. By the present Criminal Revision Application, the challenge is to the legality and validity of the Order dated 6th January 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali Division, Dindoshi, Mumbai in Criminal Appeal No.111 of 2013.
3. The brief facts are set out in Paragraph Nos.2 and 3 of the impugned Order dated 6th January 2014. The same read as under :-
“2. Briefly state
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.