HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Amit Borkar, J
Atul Deepali Dinesh Naik – Appellant
Versus
Krantivir Chafekar Education Society – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
1. By the present writ petition instituted under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner calls in question the legality and correctness of the Judgment and Order dated 20 November 2007 delivered by the School Tribunal in Appeal No. 106 of 2003. The supervisory and writ jurisdiction of this Court is invoked on the ground that the findings recorded by the Tribunal suffer from errors apparent on the face of the record and warrant judicial scrutiny.
2. The factual backdrop giving rise to the present proceedings may be stated thus. The petitioner came to be appointed as a Teacher in respondent No. 1 primary school on 13 June 1986. At the time of her initial appointment, she possessed the qualification of S.S.C. and D.Ed. Subsequently, in April 1991, the petitioner acquired the degree of Bachelor of Arts. Respondent No. 5 entered service in the same primary school on 21 November 1994, holding the qualifications of B.A. and B.Ed. from the inception of her appointment. These foundational facts are not in dispute.
3. On 12 January 1999, respondent No. 5 instituted Writ Petition No. 3824 of 1999 before this Court seeking placement in a higher pay scale. The p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.