SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 372

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
ABDUL AZIZ BHARMAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
VINOD ANAND AND ORS – Respondent


2026:BHC-AS:6353 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3595 OF 2023 Abdul Aziz Bharmar & Anr. ....Petitioners V/S Vinod Anand & Ors. ....Respondents _________

Mr. Kailas Dewal with Mr. Sham Thakur i/b Mr. Yash Dewal for the Petitioners.

Mr. Surel Shah, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rishikesh Soni and Ms. Raveena S. Yadav for Respondent No.1.

Ms. Minal Chandnani for Respondent No.10.

__________

CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE : 03 FEBRUARY 2026.

J U D G M E N T:

1. The Petition raises an interesting issue of Plaintiff’s right to claim ownership in flats constructed on non-suit land owned by a third party by use of TDR generated from the suit land, in which Plaintiff claims ownership. The issue arises in the light of opposition by the owner of non-suit land to his impleadment to the suit. No doubt the TDR is generated from the suit land in which Plaintiff claims ownership, but is the TDR akin to immovable property and whether its utilization on another land would mean ‘transfer of right’ in suit land in favour of owner of non-suit land entitling the Plaintiff to run behind such owner and claim rights in flats constructed in that land? TDR is ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top