SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 382

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
JINAM ARIHANT REALTORS – Appellant
Versus
NEHA YOGESH SACHDE – Respondent


2026:BHC-OS:3138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Digitally s C i H gn A e I d T A b N y YA ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 20865 OF 2023 CHAITANYAASHOK ASHOK JADHAV JADHAV Date:

2026.02.03 16:49:46 +0530 Jinam Arihant Realtors And Ors. …Petitioners Versus Neha Yogesh Sachde …Respondents Mr. Atul G. Damle, Senior Counsel, i/b Ashish J. Dubey, for the Petitioners.

Mr. Shanay Shah, a/w Kumar Kothari, i/b Vohuman Legal, for Respondent.

CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

PRONOUNCED ON : FEBRUARY 3, 2026

ORAL JUDGEMENT :

Context and Factual Background:

1. This is a Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the Act") challenging an arbitral award dated April 29, 2023 ("Impugned Award") by which a Learned Arbitrator has allowed the claim of the Respondent, Neha Yogesh Sachde ("Sachde") against the Petitioners. Petitioner No. 1, Jinam Arihant Realtors ("Jinam"), is a partnership firm, of which Sachde owns a 15% partnership interest, while Petitioners No. 2 to 7 hold the remaining 85% partnership interest.

2. Reliefs sought by Sachde included a declaration that Jinam, constituted under the partnership deed dated Decem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top