SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 515

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE MUKULIKA SHRIKANT JAWALKARHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
ROSHAN RAMDAS GAVALI THR. NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER RAMDAS SHANTARAM GAVALI – Appellant
Versus
THE S.T. CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE THR. MEMBER/SECRETARY AMRAVATI AND ANR. – Respondent
WP/96/2026



2026:BHC-NAG:517-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 96/2026 1. Roshan Ramdas Gavali, Aged Minor years, Occ. Education, Through his Natural Guardian Father, Ramdas Shantaram Gavali Aged 43 years, Occ. Agriculturist, R/o Mahuli Jalgaon, Tah. & Dist.

Buldhana.

... PETITIONER ...VERSUS…

1. The Schedule Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Through Its Member / Secretary, Bhatkuli Road, Amravati, Dist. Amravati.

2. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jalgaon Jamod, Tq. & Dist.

Buldhana, ...RESPONDENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Guarav Narayan Upadhyay, Advocate for petitioner Mr. N. R. Patil, AGP for respondents/State ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR AND NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED : 07 th JANUARY, 2026 .

JUDGMENT (PER : NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J.)

Heard. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Matter is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission by consent of the parties and at the request of parties.

2. By this Writ Petition, the Petitioner is challenging the order dated 28.03.2025 passed by the Respondent No.2 Sub-Divisional Officer, Jalgaon Jamod, thereby rejected the caste claim of the Petitioner, and the order dated 30.10.2025 passed by the Respondent No.1 Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati (for short the "Scrutiny Committee"), thereby invalidating the caste claim of the Petitioner to the "Koli Mahadeo" Scheduled Tribe enlisted at Sr. No. 29 in the list of Scheduled Tribes in Constitutional (S.T.) Order 1950.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner had submitted application along with numerous documents through his father to the Respondent No.2 Sub-Divisional Officer, Jalgaon Jamod for grant of Scheduled Tribe Certificate belonging to Koli Mahadeo caste falling under Scheduled Tribe Category.

4. It is further contended that respondent No. 2, after examining the documents submitted by the Petitioner, concluded that the Petitioner has not satisfied in respect of documents pertaining to blood relatives and their revenue evidence. Furthermore, respondent No. 2, by order dated 28.03.2025, refused to issue a caste certificate to the Petitioner. It is to be noted that the respondent authorities failed to consider the School Leaving Certificate issued in favour of the petitioner's father, Ramdas Shantaram Gavali, dated 28.06.1997, which unequivocally records his caste as Mahadeo Koli (Scheduled Tribe).

5. It is further submitted that the petitioner had submitted all requisite documents before respondent no.2 for issuance of the caste certificate. It was incumbent upon respondent no.2 to issue the certificate, which would thereafter be subject to verification by the Scrutiny Committee. However, both respondents have failed to discharge their duties, thereby denying justice to the petitioner. It is further contended that this Court has recently dealt with the identical issues in W.P. No. 416/2025 (Nagpur Bench), wherein by order dated 09.10.2025, both the orders passed by the Scrutiny Committee and the Sub-Divisional Officer were set aside, and directions were issued to the Sub-Divisional Officer to issue caste certificates.

6. The Petitioner contended that Respondent No. 2 rejected the Petitioner's claim by order dated 28.03.2025, which was confirmed by Respondent No. 1 through order dated 30.10.2025, thereby denying issuance of the caste certificate, which are the substance of challenge in this petition.

7. As against this, the Respondents contended that they rejected the petitioner's request for a caste certificate of "Koli Mahadeo" (Scheduled Tribe) because the petitioner failed to provide documents pertaining to blood relatives and their revenue evidence. The respondent asserted that the Petitioners failed to provide valid prior to 1950 evidence proving Scheduled Tribe status a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top