Manjula Ramlal Barot vs Iswarlal P. Barot - 2006 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 32

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2006 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 32

V.M. Kanade, J
Manjula Ramlal Barot – Appellant
Versus
Iswarlal P. Barot – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr.A.G. Sabnis, Sr.Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr.Shirish Gupte, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Amit Joshi i/b. Nankani and Associates, Mr.Ashok Mundargi with Mr.Ganesh Gole i/b. Mr.Arpan Rajput, Mr.Rajeshree M. Gadhavi & Y.S. Shinde, APPs for the State

Table of Content
1. the petitioner challenges a magistrate's order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments for seeking document production. (Para 7 , 8)
3. court's analysis of self-incrimination precedents. (Para 9 , 22)

ORAL JUDGMENT :-

. By this petition which is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Magistrate in C.C.No.47/S/84 whereby the learned Magistrate was pleased to reject the application filed by the petitioner seeking direction from the Magistrate for the production of a document from the respondents No.1 to 5 - original accused.

. Brief facts which are relevant for the purpose of deciding this petition are as under :-

2. The petitioner filed a criminal complaint in the Court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate against the respondents No.1 to 5 for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 347, 348, 386, 395, 506(ii) read with Section 120-B, 34 and 114 of the IPC.

3. It is alleged in the said complaint that the respondents forcibly took possession of the premises where the complainant was residing with her husband, after obtaining a letter signed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2006 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 32

V.M. Kanade, JManjula Ramlal Barot – AppellantVersusIswarlal P. Barot – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

V.M. Kanade, J
Manjula Ramlal Barot – Appellant
Versus
Iswarlal P. Barot – Respondent