SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 671

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
SUBHASH BABURAO ASWALE AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent


2026:BHC-AS:163 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.11613 OF 2025 Subhash Baburao Aswale and Anr. ... Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents Mr. Ranjit G. Jadhav (through VC) for Petitioners.

Mr. A.C.Bhadang, AGP for State.

CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 5 JANUARY 2026 P.C.

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners.

2. The challenge in this Petition is to an order dated 9 July 2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Jr. Division, Nashik, whereby the application preferred by the Petitioners – Defendants for rejection of the plaint under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for not having correctly valued the suit claim and paid the proper court fees thereon, came to be rejected.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that, though the Plaintiff is seeking partition and separate possession of the agricultural lands, yet, there are four bungalows constructed on the agricultural lands and the Plaintiff is also seeking partition in respect of the suit bungalows as well. Therefore, it was necessary for the Plaintiff to value the suit claim in accordance with the ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top