SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 249080

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
*Sarang V. Kotwal, Shyam C. Chandak, JJ.
Shishupal Rahul Rathod v. State of Maharashtra


1. Both these Appeals are decided by this common Judgment because these Appeals arise out of the same impugned Judgment and Order passed in the same Sessions Case.

2. The Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.981/2017 - Shishupal Rathod was the original Accused No.1 and the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.307 of 2019 - Amit Rajput was the original Accused No.2 in Sessions Case No.168/2015 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune.
For the sake of convenience, both the Appellants are referred to by their original status before the trial Court as 'the Accused No.1' and 'the Accused No.2' respectively.

3. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune vide the Judgment and Order dated 31/10/2017 passed in Sessions Case No. 168/2015, convicted both the Accused for commission of the offence punishable under S.302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced them to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default to suffer S.I. for three months. They were granted set - off under S.428 of CrPC.

4. Both the Appellants were arrested on 01/12/2014 and since then, they are in custody.

5. Heard Mr. Jayant Bardeskar, learned Counsel for the Appellant in



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top