SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1355

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
PROPEL DEVELOPERS PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
MIKUNJ KIRAN JOSHI – Respondent


Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 588 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13746 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 588 OF 2025 Propel Developers Pvt Ltd ...Appellant Versus Mikunj Kiran Joshi …Respondent SANTOSH WITH SUBHASH SECOND APPEAL NO. 586 OF 2025 KULKARNI WITH Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13865 OF 2025 Date: 2026.01.07 18:08:56 +0530 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 586 OF 2025 Propel Developers Pvt Ltd ...Petitioners Versus Manoj Nautamlal Gandhi …Respondent Mr. Vikramjit Garewal, a/w Abir Patel (through VC) and Protyusha Thanawala, i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co, for the Appellant in both Appeals.

Mr. Jairam Chandnani (through VC), a/w Shraddha Jadhav, i/b Lexim Associates, for the Respondent in both the Appeals.

CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 7th JANUARY, 2026 PC:-

SA/588/2025 and SA/587/2025

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The following substantial questions of law arise for consideration:

(i) Whether in respect of one and the same project and in matters arising out of identical facts-situation, one Bench of the Appellate Tribunal could take a contrary view on the aspect of the liab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top