Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1405
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. Gadkari, Shyam C. Chandak, JJ
Amit Devji Bouva – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Respondent
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1027 OF 2026
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Yogendra Rajgor, Adv. Kairavi Dedhia
For the Respondents: Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Dr. Dhruti Kapadia, Mr. Jainish Jain, Mr. Vijay Patil, Mr. Mohan Tekavde, Mr. Prashant Raul, Adv. Abha Tekavde, Adv. Mrudula Kadam, Adv. Chinmay Bhagat
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Yogendra Rajgor, Adv. Kairavi Dedhia
For the Respondents: Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Dr. Dhruti Kapadia, Mr. Jainish Jain, Mr. Vijay Patil, Mr. Mohan Tekavde, Mr. Prashant Raul, Adv. Abha Tekavde, Adv. Mrudula Kadam, Adv. Chinmay Bhagat
A petition challenging the Roznama of a quasi-judicial authority is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Headnote:The court analyzed the maintainability of a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, determining that an application challenging the Roznama of a quasi-judicial authority was misconceived. The court found the petition not maintainable and dismissed it in limine. The final verdict stated, 'Hence, dismissed in limine.'
P. C. :-
1) Present Petition is thoroughly misconceived as a Roznama of a quasi judicial authority is under challenge.
2) According to us, the Petition is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3) Hence, dismissed in limine.
