SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1405

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. Gadkari, Shyam C. Chandak, JJ
Amit Devji Bouva – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Respondent
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1027 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Yogendra Rajgor, Adv. Kairavi Dedhia
For the Respondents: Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Dr. Dhruti Kapadia, Mr. Jainish Jain, Mr. Vijay Patil, Mr. Mohan Tekavde, Mr. Prashant Raul, Adv. Abha Tekavde, Adv. Mrudula Kadam, Adv. Chinmay Bhagat

A petition challenging the Roznama of a quasi-judicial authority is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Headnote:The court analyzed the maintainability of a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, determining that an application challenging the Roznama of a quasi-judicial authority was misconceived. The court found the petition not maintainable and dismissed it in limine. The final verdict stated, 'Hence, dismissed in limine.'

P. C. :-

1) Present Petition is thoroughly misconceived as a Roznama of a quasi judicial authority is under challenge.

2) According to us, the Petition is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

3) Hence, dismissed in limine.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon