HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
ICICI BANK LTD. AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES' PF ORG. AND ANR – Respondent
WP/340/2019
##PAGE1##
2025:BHC-AS:57004
wp340-2019-J.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.340 OF 2019
1. ICICI Bank Limited, a company
incorporated under the Companies
Act, and scheduled bank within
the meaning of the Reserve Bank
of India Act, 1934, having it’s
Corporate office at ICICI Bank Towers,
ATUL
GANESH
Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (E),
KULKARNI
Digitally signed by Mumbai – 400 051
ATUL GANESH
KULKARNI
Date: 2025.12.23
17:07:47 +0530
2. Basavraj Arbhanad,
Branch Manager, ICICI Bank Ltd.,
having office at 18/20 C.P. Street,
Jeewan Jyoti Building, Fort,
Mumbai 400 023 … Petitioners
V/s.
1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner,
Employees’ Provident Fund
Organization, Ministry of Labour &
Employment, Government of India,
having it’s Regional Office at
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow 226 010.
2. Sahara India Employees Contributory
Provident Fund Trust, having it’s
Command Office at Sahara India
Bhawan, 1, Kapoorthala Complex,
Lucknow – 226 024. … Respondents
1
::: Uploaded on - 23/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 01/04/2026 13:19:55 :::
##PAGE2##wp340-2019-J.doc
Mr. Firoz Bharucha with Mr. Mayur Bhojwani & Ulrik
Jehangir i/by Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for the
petitioners.
Mrs. Shehnaz V. Bharucha for respondent No.1.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
RESERVED ON : DECEMBER 19, 2025
PRONOUNCED ON : DECEMBER 23, 2025
JUDGMENT:
1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this
Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. They are
aggrieved by the orders dated 18 July 2018 and 19 December
2018 passed by respondent No.1 under Section 8F of the
Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act,
1952. They also challenge the notices issued from time to time,
particularly the notice dated 28 November 2018, by which the
petitioner was wrongly declared as a defaulter under Section 8F(3)
(x) of the said Act.
2. The facts leading to the filing of the present writ petition are
thus. From the year 2016, respondent No.2 invested the provident
fund contributions of its employees with petitioner No.1 by
opening a fixed deposit account which did not permit premature
closure. Before making such investment, respondent No.2 was
expressly informed by an email dated 1 October 2016 that the
fixed deposit would not carry any facility of premature
withdrawal.
2
::: Uploaded on - 23/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 01/04/2026 13:19:55 :::
##PAGE3##wp340-2019-J.doc
3. On 11 April 2018, respondent No.1 issued a letter to
respondent No.2 stating that the exemption earlier granted under
the said Act stood cancelled. Respondent No.2 was directed to
comply with the provisions of the Act as an unexempted
establishment with effect from April 2018. Thereafter, on 13 July
2018 and 15 July 2018, respondent No.2 was again informed that
as per the agreed terms, no interest would be payable in case of
premature closure of the fixed deposit.
4. In May 2018, respondent No.2 addressed an undated letter
to petitioner No.1. In the said letter, respondent No.2 recorded the
cancellation of exemption and requested premature withdrawal of
the provident fund amounts invested with petitioner No.1. On 18
July 2018, respondent No.1 passed the impugned order under
Section 8F of the said Act, directing petitioner No.1 to remit all
amounts lying to the credit of respondent No.2. In compliance,
petitioner No.1 processed the premature withdrawal of the non
callable fixed deposit and, on 21 July 2018, remitted a sum of
Rs.37,56,54,983 by demand draft.
5. Thereafter, correspondence ensued between the petitioners
and respondent No.1 on the question whether any accrued interest
was payable on a fixed deposit which did not permit premature
withdrawal.
6. On 16 August 2018, respondent No.1 recorded that the
details of interest accrued till date had not been furnished and
directed petitioner No.1 to remit the accrued interest by demand
draft. On 6 September 2018, petitioner No.1 furnished details of
3
::: Uploaded on - 23/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 01/04/2026 13:19:55 :::
##PAGE4##wp340-2019-J
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.