SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 249257

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
SHAHEEN ANWAR SAEED – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
IAST/26502/2025



##PAGE1##

2025:BHC-AS:57543 634-ABA-3543-2025.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3543 OF 2025

Rameez Shaukat Thobani & Anr. …Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra …Respondent

WITH

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ST) NO.26392 OF 2025

IN

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3543 OF 2025

Yogendra Pukhraj Vyas …Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra …Respondent

Mr. Sanjeev Kadam a/w. Mr. Chinmay Patil, Mr. Yash Mehta, Mr.

Seoul Shah, for the Applicants.

Mr. Vikram Sutaria (through Video Conferencing) a/w. Mr. Hrituraj

Singh, for the Intervenor.

Ms. S. K. Gajre, APP, for the Respondent-State.

CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED : 24th DECEMBER 2025

PC:-

1. Heard Mr. Kadam, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the

Applicants, Mr. Vikram Sutaria, learned Counsel appearing for the

Intervenor and Ms. Gajre, learned APP appearing for the

Respondent-State.

Page 1

Sonali

::: Uploaded on - 24/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 01/04/2026 19:11:56 :::

##PAGE2##

634-ABA-3543-2025.DOC

2. This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail in connection

with C.R. No.824 of 2025 registered with Yerwada Police Station,

Pune City, Pune, for the offences punishable under Sections 3(5),

340(2), 336(3), 336(2), 318(4) and 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case is set out in paragraph Nos. 2 to 4 of the

order dated 18th December 2025 passed by the learned Additional

Sessions Judge, Pune in Criminal Bail Application No.8443 of 2025,

which reads as under:

“2] In brief it is case of the prosecution that

informant have given his property on leave and

license basis by registered document no. 16477 of

2023 to applicant no. 1 for the period of 5 years

though the agent. Thereafter she asked the applicant

no.1 to vacate the said premises as it was required for

her. But the applicant no. 1 did not respond the

informant. So she filed petition before the competent

authority. In the mean time the applicant no. 1 filed

Spl. Civil suit no. 632 of 2025 for specific

performance of contract on the ground that the

informant agreed to sell the said property to him.

3] Suddenly, the applicant no. 2 who is the employee

of applicant no. 1 in back behind of the informant

given an application under RTI Act before MSEDL

Shastrinagar, Pune to know that in whose name the

electric meter of the house was fixed. The said

application was given by putting the signature of the

informant and her mobile number and it was shown

Page 2

Sonali

::: Uploaded on - 24/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 01/04/2026 19:11:56 :::

##PAGE3##

634-ABA-3543-2025.DOC

that she is the proper person who is asking

information under RTI Act. She got knowledge

about it when she got information from the

competent authority on telephone that the

information asked by her is ready and she can take

the information. Thus the applicant no.1 & 2 have

created false and fabricated document and cheated

the informant at the office of MSEDL and lodged

report. On her report offence described above is

registered.

4] Applicant gave this application contending that

they did not give any application as civil dispute is

pending between applicant and informant. To give

criminal nature to dispute false case is filed. The

custody of applicant is not required for investigation

of the crime. Hence they may be released on

anticipatory bail.”

4. It is the submission of Mr. Kadam, learned Senior Counsel

that the Applicants are not involved in the crime. However, he

submits that the Applicants are ready to settle all the disputes with

the Intervenor i.e. the First Informant. He tenders affidavit dated

24th December 2025 of the Applicants. Paragraph Nos.3 and 4 of the

said affidavit are relevant, which read as under:

3. I state that, with a bona fide intention to amicably

resolve the disputes and bring a complete quietus to

all litigations, I have proposed a settlement to the

Complainant, without prejudice and without

admitting any allegations or liability. Hereto annexed

and ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top