HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL LAXMAN PANSAREHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
PURUSHOTTAM S/O DEENDAYAL DWIVEDI AND 5 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUGS DEPARTMENT MUMBAI AND 2 OTER – Respondent
WP/917/2014
##PAGE1##
2025:BHC-NAG:15085-DB
1
38-CriWP-244-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 244/2018
(Raju s/o Wadguji Lanjewar & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NOS. 34/2017, 201/2015,
235/2015, 256/2017, 254/2022, 476/2016, 584/2017, 713/2014,
663/2016, 664/2016, 810/2014, 841/2014, 917/2014 AND
864/2016
__________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NOS. 244/2018, 34/2017,
201/2015, 235/2015, 256/2017, 254/2022, 476/2016,
584/2017, 713/2014, 810/2014, 841/2014 AND 917/2014
Mr. Sanket Walde h/f Mr. S.R. Narnaware, Counsel for the
petitioners.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NOS. 663/2016, 664/2016 AND
864/2016
Mr. Nilesh Nagapure h/f Mr. A.V. Band, Counsel for the
petitioners.
Mr. A.B. Badar, A.P.P. for the respondent/State.
.....
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND
RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.
DECEMBER 24, 2025
The petitioners claim themselves to be the
medical practitioners on the basis of degrees issued by the
State Ayurvedic and Unani Medical Council, Bihar,
governed and regulated by the Bihar Development of
Ayurvedic and Unani Systems of Medicine Act, 1951 (for
short “Act of 1951”). The petitioners have, however, not
placed on record copy of degrees. What is placed is a
certificate saying that their names are registered as
medical practitioners at Patna in terms of the Act of 1951.
2] The petitioners have approached this Court
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
##PAGE2##2
38-CriWP-244-2018
declaration that they are covered by the definition of
‘registered medical practitioner’ entitled to keep all
allopathic medicines by virtue of their degrees and
registrations in the State of Bihar in terms of order dated
29/7/1998 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the
case of State of Haryana Vs. Phool Singh [Criminal
Appeal No. 369/1994], which reads as under :
“For the last few days, we have heard a batch of
civil matters in which sub-clause (iii), claue
(ee) of Rule 2 of the Drugs and Cosmetics
Rules, 1945 has been the subject matter of
debate in its widest spectrum. Prima facie
conclusions drawn therefrom make us fould
that the judgment of the High Court cannot be
faulted with. The respondent does come within
the definition of a registered medical
practitioner entitled to allopathic medicines on
virtue of his degree and registration in the State
of Bihar. We thus find nothing to interfere in
this appeal. The appeal is therefore dismissed.”
3] Thus, the Supreme Court has, on prima
facie basis, opined that the conclusions drawn by the
High Court cannot be faulted with. The Court then held
that the respondent therein comes within the definition of
‘registered medical practitioner’ entitled to allopathic
medicines on virtue of his degree and registration in the
State of Bihar.
4] Subsequent thereto, the Supreme Court, in
the case of Dr Mukhtiar Chand And Others Vs. State of
Punjab and Others [(1998) 7 SCC 579], took an
altogether different view, which reads as under :
“49. The upshot of the above discussion is that
Rule 2(ee)(iii) as effected from 14-5-1960 is
valid and does not suffer from the vice of want
##PAGE3##3
38-CriWP-244-2018
of legislative competence and the notifications
issued by the State Governments thereunder are
not ultra vires the said Rule and are legal.
However, after sub-section (2) in Section 15 of
the 1956 Act occupied the field vide Central Act
24 of 1964 with effect from 16-6-1964, the
benefit of the said Rule and the notifications
issued thereunder would be available only in
those States where the privilege of such right to
practise any system of medicine is conferred by
the State law under which practitioners of
Indian medicine are registered in the State,
which is for the time being in force. The
position with regard to medical practitioners of
Indian medicine holding degrees in integrated
courses is on the same plane inasmuch as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.