HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE URMILA SACHIN JOSHI- PHALKEHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
SHARDUL SHIVDAS UKEY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO POLICE STATION BELTARODI DIST. NAGPUR AND ANOTHER – Respondent
APL/998/2021
##PAGE1##
2025:BHC-NAG:14849-DB
J-apl998.21 final.odt 1/11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) No.998 OF 2021
Shri. Shardul Shivdas Ukey,
Aged about : 30 years,
Occupation : Private Service,
R/o. Plot No. 12, Waghmare Layout,
Parsodi, Tahsil : Umred,
Distt. : Nagpur – 441 203.
(M) 95035 44746. : APPLICANT
...VERSUS...
1. The State of Maharashtra
Through Police Station Officer
Police Station, Beltarodi,
Nagpur.
2. Shruti Suresh Ramteke,
Age : 29 years, Occ. : Service,
R/o.108, A-1 Building, Forest
Seminary Hills, Colony,
Gittikhadan, Nagpur. : NON-APPLICANTS
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Mr. J.M. Gandhi, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. Nikhil Joshi, Additional Public Prosecutor for Non-applicant No.1.
Mr. Chaitanya B. Barve, Advocate for Non-applicant No.2.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND
NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ.
RESERVED ON : 11 th DECEMBER, 2025.
PRONOUNCED ON : 23 rd DECEMBER, 2025.
JUDGMENT : (Per : Nandesh S. Deshpande, J.)
1. Heard. Admit. Heard finally by consent of learned
##PAGE2##J-apl998.21 final.odt 2/11
counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The applicant has approached this Court by filing the
present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of the First Information Report
(for short “FIR”) dated 07.08.2021, registered as Crime No.
337/2021 at Police Station Beltarodi, Nagpur, as also for quashing
of Charge-sheet dated 30.08.2025 registered as Final Report Form
No.151/2025 under Section 376 (2)(n) of Indian Penal Code (for
short “IPC”) pending before learned Special Judicial Magistrate,
Nagpur.
3. As per the case of non-applicant No. 2, and as reflected
in the First Information Report dated 07.08.2021, it is the case of
non-applicant No.2 that, present applicant and she became
acquainted through the matrimonial website ‘shaadi.com’. They
met for the first time on 19.03.2020, began communicating over
phone calls, and gradually their acquaintance developed into a love
affair. Subsequently, on 09.09.2020, the applicant invited
non-applicant No. 2 to meet him at Hotel Ashoka, Nagpur, took her
to a hotel room, compelled her to consume alcohol, and established
physical relations with her on the assurance of marriage.
Thereafter, the applicant continued to call her and established
##PAGE3##J-apl998.21 final.odt 3/11
physical relations on multiple occasions.
4. Further, on 19.11.2020, non-applicant No. 2 learnt that
the applicant was going to be engaged to another girl. When she
confronted him about the same, he replied that although his
parents wanted him to marry someone else, he intended to marry
only non-applicant No. 2. However, due to this development,
non-applicant No. 2 became distressed, stopped communicating
with the applicant, and lodged the First Information Report which
is challenged in the present application.
5. We have heard Mr. J.M. Gandhi, learned counsel for
applicant, Mr. Nikhil Joshi, Additional Public Prosecutor, for non-
applicant No.1/State and Mr. Chaitanya Barve, learned counsel for
non-applicant No.2.
6. The learned counsel for the applicant submits the
allegations are founded on an admitted long-standing consensual
relationship between the applicant and Non-applicant No.2. Even
assuming, without admitting, that the initial physical intimacy was
on a promise of marriage, the subsequent and continued
relationship over a considerable period cannot, in law, be construed
as being on such pretext, but is clearly consensual in nature.
7. The learned counsel submits that there is unexplained
##PAGE4##J-apl998.21 final.odt 4/11
delay in lodging the First Information Report. The alleged incident
is of 09.09.2020, whereas the complaint was filed on 07.08.2021,
after an inordinate delay of nearly eleven months, without any
plausible explanation except the alleged breakdown of the
relationship.
8. Learned Counsel further submits that, First Information
Report itself discloses that on 19.11.2020, when non-applica
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.