HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
HYDER RAZA SHABIR HASAN – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI – Respondent
AOST/40729/2025
##PAGE1##
P13.AOST.40729.2025.doc
HARSH ADA H. SAWANT
(P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.40729 OF 2025
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (ST.) NO.40730 OF 2025
Hyder Raza Shabir Hasan .. Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai .. Respondent
....................
Mr. V. T. Dubey, Advocate for Appellant.
...................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 23, 2025
P.C . :
1. Not on Board. Mentioned by way of filing praecipe dated
23.12.2025. Perused the praecipe.
2. Heard Mr. Dubey, learned Advocate for Appellant.
3. This Appeal from Order assails order dated 08.12.2025
passed in Notice of Motion No.5080 of 2025 by the learned Trial Court
which is appended at page No.86 of the Appeal from Order in respect
of suit structure belonging to the Appellant – Plaintiff on the premise
that suit structure is not a tolerated structure proving its existence as
on or prior to the datum line.
4. When the impugned notice was issued to the Plaintiff he
submitted a detailed reply thereto with documentary evidence on
11.07.2025. He was duly heard on 01.08.2025 by the Designated
1 of 3
::: Uploaded on - 23/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 02/04/2026 08:57:00 :::
##PAGE2##P13.AOST.40729.2025.doc
Officer of the Corporation and speaking order dated 19.08.2025 was
passed. While noting the 10 instances of documentary evidence
produced by the Plaintiff, the Designated Officer concluded that notice
structure was not a tolerated structure being in existence from
01.04.1962 and therefore was unauthorised and called upon Plaintiff
to remove the same.
5. In defence of the Plaintiff’s case Mr. Dubey has drawn my
attention to the impugned order and consideration accorded by
Municipal Corporation to the documentary evidence appended to the
reply filed by Plaintiff to the show-cause notice.
6. Perusal of the speaking order prima facie shows that the
Designated Officer has verified the documents after receiving remarks
from the concerned Assistant Engineer i.e. appropriate Authority of ‘L’
Ward with regard to the first date of assessment of the suit structure
and has stated that suit structure was first assessed on 01.04.1977.
The documentary evidence of the tax paid by the Plaintiff certifying
this date is appended to the Appeal from Order.
7. Once the record of Corporation, inter alia, justifies the
existence of the suit structure as on 01.04.1977 having been assessed
to tax, the conclusion reached by Corporation that it is unauthorised
structure being not in existence on the datum line cannot be accepted
at face value. If Corporation desires to take steps for removal of
2 of 3
::: Uploaded on - 23/12/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 02/04/2026 08:57:00 :::
##PAGE3##P13.AOST.40729.2025.doc
structure in the year 2025 as unauthorised, there was no reason for
Corporation to tolerate its existence and subsistence since 1977. What
is significant is that verification of the document and remark received
from the concerned appropriate Authority justify the subsistence and
existence of the structure since 1977 prima facie.
8. On the basis of the above, an arguable case is clearly made
out by Mr. Dubey for grant of relief to the Plaintiff in the Appeal from
Order.
9. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 08.12.2025
shall stand stayed forthwith. Corporation is directed not to take any
steps against Plaintiff’s notice structure until the present Appeal from
Order is determined by this Court.
10. In view of the above, issue notice to Respondent.
11. Humdast permitted. In addition to Court’s notice, Appellant
is directed to serve the Respondent a copy of this order and copy of
Appeal from Order and Interim Application and inform about the next
date of hearing by any permissible mode of service and file appropriate
affidavit of service with tangible proof thereof.
12. Stand over to 09th February, 2026.
13. Praecipe is disposed.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
H. H. SAWANT
3 of 3
Digitally signed
by HARSHADA
HARSHADA HANUMANT
HANUMANT SAWANT
SAWANT Date:
2025.12.23
17:21:27 +05
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.