SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MAK – Appellant
Versus
AKK – Respondent


2025:BHC-AS:54818 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3828 OF 2024 M Dadar, Mumbai-400 028 …Petitioner Versus Dadar West, Mumbai-400 028. …Respondent Mr. Samarth Moray i/b. Ms. Shivani Shinde, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Vikramaditya Deshmukh a/w Ms. Priya Chaubey i/b. Ms. Sapana Rachure, for the Respondent.

Ms. S.S. Kaushik, APP, for the Respondent-State.

CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.

RESERVED ON : 05th DECEMBER 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 12th DECEMBER 2025 JUDGMENT :-

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties.

2. The Petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 22.08.2023, passed by the Judge, Family Court No.7, Bandra, Mumbai, below Exhibit 10A, in Petition No. A 1899 of 2020, a prayer is made to set aside the said order and enhance the interim maintenance to Rs. 3,50,000/- p.m. or such other and higher amount as this Court deems fit, just and proper, from the date of the application filed by the Petitioner.

3. The undisputed facts of the case are that, the petitioner and the Respondent were married on 11.04.2014. There are two minor children (1) Sana Amit Khajanchi born on 31.12.2008 and (

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top