SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 351940

MAK – Appellant
Versus
AKK – Respondent


JUDGMENT :-

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties.

2. The Petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 22.08.2023, passed by the Judge, Family Court No.7, Bandra, Mumbai, below Exhibit 10A, in Petition No. A 1899 of 2020, a prayer is made to set aside the said order and enhance the interim maintenance to Rs. 3,50,000/- p.m. or such other and higher amount as this Court deems fit, just and proper, from the date of the application filed by the Petitioner.

3. The undisputed facts of the case are that, the petitioner and the Respondent were married on 11.04.2014. There are two minor children (1) Sana Amit Khajanchi born on 31.12.2008 and (2) Yana Amit Khajanchi born on 27.01.2014. The Petitioner has completed her education up to 12th Class and is a home-maker, while the Respondent is a graduate in Commerce. He works along with his father, and is managing the family business, namely,

‘Khajanchi Exports’. The Respondent filed Petition for Divorce on 10.09.2020, in the Family Court at Bandra, which is numbered as MJ Petition No. A-1899 of 2020. The Petitioner also filed maintenance Petition No. C-2 of 2021 on 04.12.2020 for mainte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top