SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Arun Hastimal Firodia – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent


2025:BHC-AUG:9103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 64 OF 2023 Arun s/o Hastimal Firodiya … Petitioner Age: 77 years, Occu: Business (Ori. Accused R/o Kinetic Engineering Ltd., No.3)

D-1 Block, Plot No. 18/2 MIDC, Chinchwad, Pune 411 019 VERSUS

1. The State of Maharashtra

2. Ramrao Hanumantrao Kandekar … Respondents Age 77 years, Occu: Agri. (R-2/employee)

R/o Nepti,Tq. & Dist. Ahmednagar Mr. Rajendrraa Deshmukkh, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Rakshanda Rajan Jaiswal i/by Mr. Vishal Chavan, Advocate for the Petitioner, Mr. S. M. Ganachari, APP for Respondent No.1 State Mr. V. P. Golewar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.

RESERVED ON : 10.03.2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 27.03.2025 JUDGMENT:-

1. At the outset it is to be mentioned that, on 06.02.2025, during the course of argument, Mr. Rajendrraa Deshmukkh, the learned senior counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. V. P. Golewar, learned counsel for respondent No.2 jointly made the statement about amicable settlement of dispute between the parties. In pursuance of said statement, the Petitioner/Chairman of the Industrial Establishment and employer of Respondent i.e. Kin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top