SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PVG – Appellant
Versus
VIG – Respondent


2025:BHC-AS:32358 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No.2686 of 2024

1. Mrs. P G , Mowa, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Mr. H S D Mowa, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Mr. P H D Mowa, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. … Petitioners.

V/s.

1. Mr. I l G , Chembur(E), Mumbai-400071.

Digitally signed by LATA 2. State of Maharashtra LATA SUNIL SUNIL PANJWANI through Public Prosecutor PANJWANI Date:

2025.07.31 Bombay High Court, Bombay. … Respondents.

+0530 Mr. Shyam Dewani a/w. Advocates for the Petitioners.

Advocate Sachet Makhija a/w.

CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J DATE : 17th July 2025.

ORAL JUDGMENT:

Heard learned Advocate Dewani for the Petitioners-the Accused persons and learned Advocate for Respondent No.1-

Complainant.

2. It is a matter of record that up til now no process is issued for an offence punishable under Section 500,506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against these Petitioners. Though the Respondent No.1 has requested the Court of 11 th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kurla to issue process for those sections against the Petitioners, however, he has failed. The learned Magistrate as per the order dated 15th April 2023 has dismissed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top