SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 351958

Yogesh Mangilal Mundhara – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


ORDER (Per Chief Justice):

1. The petitioner claims to be a social activist. In this petition filed as Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner, inter alia, seeks a direction to respondent nos.1 to 4 to follow the procedure laid down by the Central Vigilance Commission (Public Procurement Manual) while awarding tenders/contracts in respect of collection and disposal of solid waste in the cities of Thane, Panvel and Navi Mumbai. The petitioner, in addition, seeks a direction that while awarding tenders in future for the purposes of collection and disposal of solid waste in the State, the guidelines for award of contract should be framed.

2. Respondent nos.2 to 4 are Municipal Corporations of Thane, Panvel and Navi Mumbai respectively and are established under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. The respondent nos. 2 to 4 have issued various tenders for City Cleaning Services. Pursuant to the aforesaid notice inviting tender, several persons submitted their bids. Respondent nos.5, 6 and 7 have been held eligible to participate in the tender and all the three Municipal Corporations have granted the tender to respondent no.7.

3. In the aforesaid factual background, the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top