SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Vinod Kachave – Appellant
Versus
The Presiding Officer (ICC) – Respondent


P.C. :

1) The Petition challenges judgment and order dated 1 July 2024 passed by Member Industrial Court, Pune dismissing Appeal (IESO) No. 1 of 2023 filed under provisions of Section 18 Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Rules, 2013 (POSH Act). Petitioner had challenged the report dated 30 September 2022 passed by the Internal Complaints Committee of Respondent No.2-Employer.

2) I have heard Ms. Sana Khan, the learned counsel appearing for Petitioner. Despite service of notice, none has appeared on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

3) In its report dated 30 September 2022, the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) has reproduced three broad allegations against the Petitioner as under:

Incident 1

She mentioned that Vinod Kachave has passed a comment on her hair looking at the length and volume that, “you must be using JCB to manage your hair”. Also, he started singing a song related to her hair.

Incident 2

Tanya Sharma further narrated an incident where, Vinod Kachave had passed a sexual remark on a male employee’s private part. Pravin Kedar, in a common forum where other female employees were present. He checked with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top