SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ARP – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


2.XYZ in FIR No.737/2023 registered at Police Station Beltarodi, Nagpur. ... NON-APPLICANTS.

---------------------------------

Mr. S.P. Sonwane, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. S.M. Ukey, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1.

Mr.J.B. Gandhi, Advocate for Non-applicant No.2.

----------------------------------

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND M.M. NERLIKAR, JJ.

DATE : JULY 08, 2025.

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER M.M. NERLIKAR, J.) :

Heard. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and by consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, matters are taken up for final disposal.

2. The informant [Non-applicant No.2] in the present matters has lodge a complaint with non-applicant no.1 Beltarodi Police Station, Nagpur on 18.12.2023, which came to be registered as First Information Report No.737/2023 for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 377 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The said first information report is registered against all the applicants. Applicant in Criminal Application No.900/2025 is husband of the informant, while applicant in Criminal Application No.290/2025 are sisters namely - Kavita Pal and Shweta Pal of husband and applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top