Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A. S. Gadkari, Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale, JJ
Akhil Anil Chitre – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of an fir involving assault charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. parties' arguments regarding the sufficiency of evidence and completion of investigation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court refuses to conduct a mini-trial, relegating petitioner to discharge proceedings. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. dismissal of petition and rejection of interim relief. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT [Per: RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J] :-
1) The Petitioner, by the present Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has approached this Court with a prayer that, the FIR bearing No.884/2020 dated 4th December, 2020 filed under sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered with Dindoshi Police Station, be quashed and set aside.
2) This Court vide its order dated 8th February, 2021 was pleased to issue notice to Respondent. Respondent No.2, though served has not appeared.
3) Heard Mr. Tapan Thattet, learned Advocate for the Petitioner and Smt. M. M. Deshmukh, Acting PP with Mr. Vinod Chate, learned APP for the Respondent – State. Perused record.
4) The Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR registered with Dindoshi Police Station, being C.R. N
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
