HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARTI ARUN SATHE
NANDKUMAR PAWAR – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP/507/2026
##PAGE1##
2026:BHC-OS:4429-DB
15 WP 507-26.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 507 OF 2026
Nandkumar Pawar ...Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents
_______
Mr. Anil Balani a/w Jas Singhavi, P. Pawar i/b. Durgaprasad Pujari for Petitioner.
Mr. J. B. Mishra a/w Mamta Omle & Rupesh Dubey for the Respondents.
_______
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
AARTI SATHE, JJ.
DATE: 4th FEBRUARY 2026
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER AARTI SATHE, J.):-
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges
the Order-in-Original bearing No. JC/SW/98/ADJN. APSC (hereinafter referred
to as “the impugned order”) dated 3rd April 2024 whereby a penalty of Rs.
31,50,88,552/- under Section 112(a) and 112(b) and Rs. 129,14,32,317/- under
Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”),
being imposed on the Petitioner. The impugned order finds its genesis in search
proceedings, which were carried out by the officers of the Customs (Preventive),
Marine and Preventive Wing, Mumbai at the offices of M/s. Shree Charbhuja
Diamonds Pvt. Ltd (SCDPL), M/s. Kanika Gems Pvt. Ltd and M/s. Yogeshwar
Digitally signed by
MANISH MANISH
SURESHRAO S THUR ATE TS EHRAO
THATTE Date: 2026.02.17
11:38:37 +0530
Diamonds Pvt. Ltd., who allegedly indulged in making fraudulent outward foreign
Page 1 of 9
Laxmi
::: Uploaded on - 17/02/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 28/04/2026 11:54:10 :::
##PAGE2##15 WP 507-26.DOC
exchange remittance using fake/duplicate bills of entries fabricated on the basis of
genuine bills of entry.
3. Briefly, the facts are as under:-
i. The Petitioner acted as a Customs broker on behalf of SCDPL, who was the
importer of diamonds. The Petitioner complied with the KYC norms and
ascertained the authenticity of the importers through the website of the Directorate
General of Foreign Trade (DGFT). The Importer also provided his Importer-
Exporter Certificate (IEC) bearing No. 5211000731.
ii. After verifying the genuineness of the Importer on the basis of the KYC
documents, the Petitioner cleared six import consignments of rough polished
diamonds for SCDPL on 14th May 2013 and 15th May 2013.
iii. As stated above, on the basis of the intelligence received by the Customs
Department, the officers of the Customs (Preventive), Marine and Preventive
Wing, Mumbai conducted search and seizure actions at the various premises of the
importers including SCDPL.
iv. Statements of various persons connected with the said import including that
of the Petitioner was recorded by the officers under Section 108 of the Act and on
the basis of the aforesaid investigation, the Customs Broker license of the
Petitioner’s firm was suspended by the Principal Commissioner of Customs
(General), Mumbai Zone-I.
Page 2 of 9
Laxmi
::: Uploaded on - 17/02/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 28/04/2026 11:54:10 :::
##PAGE3##15 WP 507-26.DOC
v. On the basis of the aforesaid investigation, the Additional Commissioner of
the Customs (Preventive), Marine and Preventive Wing, Mumbai issued a show
cause notice bearing No. II/MPIU-II/07/M&P/2014/SCN dated 9th February 2021
inter-alia alleging that the Petitioner willfully abetted in the misuse and mis-
declaration of the name of the importer and IEC in the six bills of entry and
therefore proposed to impose penalty on the Petitioner under Sections 112(a) and
112(b) along with Section 114AA and/or 117 of the Act. In pursuance of the
aforesaid show cause notice, Respondent No.2 passed the impugned order which is
the subject matter of challenge in the present Petition.
4. By the impugned order, a large penalty of Rs. 31,50,88,552/- under
Section 112(a) and 112(b) and Rs. 129,14,32,317/- under Section 114AA of the
Customs Act, 1962, has been imposed on the Petitioner. This penalty has been
imposed on the basis of investigation carried out at the premises of the three
importers as noted in para 2 above.
5. We have perused the records and the impugned order with the
assistance of the learned C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.