SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 2911

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
VIVEK ALPHONSUS ARANHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARJUN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3264 OF 2024 VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Vivek Alphonsus Aranha …Applicant Versus Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents KUDHEKAR Date: 2026.02.05 20:15:38 +0530 None for the Applicant.

Mr. S. M. Mangaonkar, APP, for the Respondent-State.

CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 05 FEBRUARY 2026 PC:-

1. None appears for the Applicant.

2. In the present Anticipatory Bail Application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the relief sought is of pre-arrest bail in connection with CR No.82 of 2016 registered with the Lashkar Police Station, Pune City, for the offences punishable under Sections 120B read with 406, 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. A learned Single Judge by Order dated 4th December 2024 has already granted interim protection to the Applicant.

4. The age of the Applicant is 80 years. The FIR is concerning the loan obtained in the year 2013 and the FIR has been lodged in the year 2016.

5. As the Applicant is a senior citizen of 80 years, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed.

6. In view thereof, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top