HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL
Sandip Premratan Bhure – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO MOHADI PS TQ MOHADI DIST BHANDARA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
APL/1196/2024
##PAGE1##
2026:BHC-NAG:2365-DB
932apl1196.2024.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1196 OF 2024
APPLICANT :- Sandip s/o Premratan Bhure,
Aged 27 years, Occu: Driver,
R/o Navegaon, Tq. Mohadi, Distt.
Bhandara, present residing at Sudama
Nagari, Nagpur Tq. and Dist. Nagpur.
..VERSUS..
RESPONDENTS :- 1) State of Maharashtra,
Through Police Station Officer, Mohadi
Police Station, Tq. Mohadi, Dist.
Bhandara.
2) Food Safety Officer, Food and Drug
Administration (M.S.), Bhandara.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Shyamsundar Ajay Mohta, counsel for applicant.
Ms Soniya Thakur, APP for respondent/State.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 05 /0 2 /2026
ORAL JUDGMENT :
1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of
Mr. Shyamsundar Ajay Mohta, learned counsel for the applicant and
Ms. Soniya Thakur, learned APP for respondent/State, the application is taken
up for final hearing at the stage of admission.
2. By way of present application, the applicant seeks to challenge
Sessions Case No. 46 of 2024 (State Vs Sandip and others), arising out of
rkn
##PAGE2##932apl1196.2024.odt
2
Crime No. 104 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections
188, 272, 273 and 328 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 26 (2)(i),
26(2)(iv), 27(3)(e), 3(1) (zz)(iv) and Food Safety and Standard Act 2006.
3. It is the submission of the present applicant that, in view of the law
laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Ram Nath Vs
State of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2024) 3 SCC 502, the offence under
the provisions of Indian Penal Code are not tenable, and the Food Safety
Officer can initiate the proceedings only under the provisions of Food Safety
and Standards Act. It is contended that the Food Safety Officer alone is
empowered to initiate such proceedings. Therefore, relying upon the said
judgment, which has been followed in subsequent decisions of the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India, the applicant seeks indulgence of this Court.
4. Ms. Soniya Thakur, learned APP for the State, has vehemently
opposed the said application and prayed for rejection of the application.
According to the learned APP, the issue as to whether proceedings can be
continued simultaneously under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code and
the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, is pending consideration before the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Therefore, it is submitted that at this stage
the registration of offence cannot be quashed and set aside against the present
applicant.
5. In the light of the submissions made by both the parties, I have gone
through the complaint which is lodged against the present applicant.
6. In the present case, it appears that the Food Safety Officer, on receipt
of information, visited the spot and found that Applicant No. 1 was travelling
in a four-wheeler with contraband articles. The police officer on patrolling
duty intercepted the vehicle and found that the articles being transported were
banned by the State of Maharashtra vide notification dated 15/07/2022. As
such, considering the fact that seized contraband articles were being
rkn
##PAGE3##932apl1196.2024.odt
3
transported in violation of notification issued by the Food Safety
Commissioner, the offence came to be registered against the present applicant
in the matter.
7. In this regard, it is pertinent to note that, as per the law laid down by
the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Ram Nath (supra) it is held
that the provisions of Food Safety and Standard Act, being the most stringent,
overrides the general provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, particularly in
a food-related matters. Therefore, it will be proper for the prosecution that
inquiry should be on the basis of provisions of Food Safety and Standards Act
onl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.