2026:BHC-NAG:2052-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO . 483/2024

1. Shaikh Abdul Khalique Mohammed Firoz, (Husband)

Aged: 41 years, Occu: Private, 2. Hanifa @ Sammi Firoz Shaikh, (Mother-in-law)

Aged: 63 years, Occu: Household, Applicant No. 1 and 2 R/o. Near Gadwal Chawl Karamatulla Malik Chawl, Khindi Pada, Dargah Road, Bhandup Complex S.O. Mumbai

3. Hena @ Bushra Shadab Shaikh, (Sister-in-law)

Aged: 36 years, Occu: Household, R/o. Room No. 201, Banking Colony, Ekta Nagar, Mapsa, Goa, 4. Sana Parvin Juned Shaikh, (Sister-in-law)

Aged: 35 years, Occu: Household, R/o. 521, Nana Peth, Sant Kabir Chowk, Opp Abhyudaya Bank, pune City, Pune ... APPLICANTS ...VERSUS…

1. State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O., Nagpuri Gate, Amravati

2. Ursiya Fatema Abdul Khalique, Aged: 29 years, Occu: Private, R/o. Taj Nagar No. 2, Nagpuri Gate, Amravati ...NON-APPLICANTS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shri M. Rai, Advocate for applicants Ms Soniya Thakur, APP for non-applicant No.1/State ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM : PRAVIN S . PATIL , J .

DATED : 04.02.2026 ORAL JUDGMENT Heard. By consent of the parties, this matter is taken for final disposal at admission stage.

2. By this application, the applicant is seeking to quash and set aside proceedings registered as RCC 1307/2023 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amravati on the basis of First Information Report vide Crime No.522/2022 arising out of charge-sheet No.114/2023 for the offences punishable under Section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The present applicant who have approached to quash the criminal proceedings are the husband, mother-in-law, married sister-in-law of the non-applicant No.2. According to the present applicants, even the allegations, which are level against them are taken on its face value, no offence is made out against them under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and seeks indulgence of this Court in the matter.

4. The case of the prosecution in short is that the non- applicant No.2 has performed second marriage with the present applicant No.1. Immediately, after marriage was solemnized, she was given ill-treatment by the husband. She was abused by the present applicants on the count of dowry and one time, she was also slapped by the applicants. The allegations against the relatives of the applicants are made that they used to instigate her husband and due to that instigation, she was ill-treated by the husband.

5. It is seen from the complaint that she has earlier lodged complaint on 21.01.2021 against the present applicant but on that complaint, no offence was registered and, therefore, she has lodged the second complaint on 02.11.2022, and on the allegations in subsequent complaint, the offence came to be registered in the present matter.

6. In light of submissions made by the learned Counsel for both sides before this Court, it would be relevant to consider Section 498-A of IPC. The bare perusal of this provision shows that vide its Explanation cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive a woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of a woman. As per Explanation (b) harassment is done with a view to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand. As such, while deciding these allegations, this Court has to first look into whether the cruelty which is allegedly falls in the explanation provided under Section

498-A of IPC.

7. It is also pertinent to note that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and this Court has experienced that there is a tendency of implicating the husband and his relatives in the criminal offence on vague