SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3132

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
LODHA DEVELOPERS LTD – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA NARPATMAL LODHA – Respondent
SL/42990/2025



##PAGE1##

2026:BHC-OS:2379

79.SL.42290.2025.doc

Ajay

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

SUIT (L) NO.42990 OF 2025

WITH

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 43039 OF 2025

IN

SUIT (L) NO. 42990 OF 2025

Lodha Developers Ltd. Applicant/Orig.

.. Plaintiff

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Lodha Developers Ltd. .. Plaintiff

Versus

Rajendra Narpatmal Lodha and Ors. .. Defendants

....................

 Mr. Karl Tamboly a/w. Mr. Pradeep Bakhru, Mr. Advait Nisal, Mr.

Piyush Kranti, Ms. Silpa Nair and Ms. Juhi Bahirwani, Advocates

i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Plaintiff.

 Mr. Sumanth Anchan, Advocate i/by Mr. Shantanu Kadam for

Defendant Nos.1 to 4.

....................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JANUARY 28, 2026.

P.C.:

1. Mentioned out of turn.

2. Heard Mr. Tamboly, learned Advocate for Plaintiff and Mr.

Anchan, learned Advocate for Defendant Nos.1 to 4.

3. Plaintiff, Defendant Nos.1, 2 and 3 have executed Consent

Terms dated 28th January 2026 and Plaintiff and Defendant No.4 have

executed Consent Terms dated 28th January 2026 (hereinafter referred

to as the “Consent Terms”), settling the disputes in the present Suit in

respect of all claims of the respective parties.

1 of 3

::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 03/05/2026 13:13:56 :::

##PAGE2##

79.SL.42290.2025.doc

4. Consent Terms have been signed by Plaintiff’s Authorised

Signatory. Defendant Nos.1 to 4 have signed the Consent Terms in

their individual capacities. Advocates for Plaintiff and Defendant Nos.1

to 4 are present in Court.

5. Consent Terms dated 28th January 2026 are taken on record

and marked as ‘X’ and ‘X-1’ respectively for identification. Consent

Terms dated 28th January 2026 marked as ‘X’ are executed between

Plaintiff and Defendant Nos.1 to 3 whereas Consent Terms dated 28th

January 2026 marked as ‘X-1’ are executed between Plaintiff and

Defendant No.4 separately. Consent Terms marked as ‘X’ are running

into 30 pages whereas Consent Terms marked as ‘X-1’ are running into

22 pages. Parties have confirmed that they have signed these Consent

Terms on their own free will without any fraud or coercion.

6. Order in terms of the Consent Terms.

7. The undertaking given by the parties in the Consent Terms

are recorded and accepted as undertakings given to this Court.

8. Suit is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms.

9. Registry is directed to draw up a decree reflecting the

Consent Terms.

10. Sealing of the drawn-up decree is dispensed with.

2 of 3

::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 03/05/2026 13:13:56 :::

##PAGE3##

79.SL.42290.2025.doc

11. Certified copy of the order passed in terms of the Consent

Terms is expedited.

12. No order as to costs.

13. Liberty to the parties to mention.

14. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.

15. In view of the above, Suit is disposed. Pending Interim

Application (L) No.43039 of 2025 stands disposed with no order as to

costs.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

Ajay

Digitally signed

A TRJA AY MBAK b T Uy R G AA AMJ LA MBY A UK GALE

UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.01.28

18:08:18 +0530

3 of 3

::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 03/05/2026 13:13:56 :::

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top