2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3132
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
LODHA DEVELOPERS LTD – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA NARPATMAL LODHA – Respondent
SL/42990/2025
##PAGE1##
2026:BHC-OS:2379
79.SL.42290.2025.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT (L) NO.42990 OF 2025
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 43039 OF 2025
IN
SUIT (L) NO. 42990 OF 2025
Lodha Developers Ltd. Applicant/Orig.
.. Plaintiff
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:
Lodha Developers Ltd. .. Plaintiff
Versus
Rajendra Narpatmal Lodha and Ors. .. Defendants
....................
Mr. Karl Tamboly a/w. Mr. Pradeep Bakhru, Mr. Advait Nisal, Mr.
Piyush Kranti, Ms. Silpa Nair and Ms. Juhi Bahirwani, Advocates
i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Plaintiff.
Mr. Sumanth Anchan, Advocate i/by Mr. Shantanu Kadam for
Defendant Nos.1 to 4.
....................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : JANUARY 28, 2026.
P.C.:
1. Mentioned out of turn.
2. Heard Mr. Tamboly, learned Advocate for Plaintiff and Mr.
Anchan, learned Advocate for Defendant Nos.1 to 4.
3. Plaintiff, Defendant Nos.1, 2 and 3 have executed Consent
Terms dated 28th January 2026 and Plaintiff and Defendant No.4 have
executed Consent Terms dated 28th January 2026 (hereinafter referred
to as the “Consent Terms”), settling the disputes in the present Suit in
respect of all claims of the respective parties.
1 of 3
::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 03/05/2026 13:13:56 :::
##PAGE2##79.SL.42290.2025.doc
4. Consent Terms have been signed by Plaintiff’s Authorised
Signatory. Defendant Nos.1 to 4 have signed the Consent Terms in
their individual capacities. Advocates for Plaintiff and Defendant Nos.1
to 4 are present in Court.
5. Consent Terms dated 28th January 2026 are taken on record
and marked as ‘X’ and ‘X-1’ respectively for identification. Consent
Terms dated 28th January 2026 marked as ‘X’ are executed between
Plaintiff and Defendant Nos.1 to 3 whereas Consent Terms dated 28th
January 2026 marked as ‘X-1’ are executed between Plaintiff and
Defendant No.4 separately. Consent Terms marked as ‘X’ are running
into 30 pages whereas Consent Terms marked as ‘X-1’ are running into
22 pages. Parties have confirmed that they have signed these Consent
Terms on their own free will without any fraud or coercion.
6. Order in terms of the Consent Terms.
7. The undertaking given by the parties in the Consent Terms
are recorded and accepted as undertakings given to this Court.
8. Suit is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms.
9. Registry is directed to draw up a decree reflecting the
Consent Terms.
10. Sealing of the drawn-up decree is dispensed with.
2 of 3
::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 03/05/2026 13:13:56 :::
##PAGE3##79.SL.42290.2025.doc
11. Certified copy of the order passed in terms of the Consent
Terms is expedited.
12. No order as to costs.
13. Liberty to the parties to mention.
14. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
15. In view of the above, Suit is disposed. Pending Interim
Application (L) No.43039 of 2025 stands disposed with no order as to
costs.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Ajay
Digitally signed
A TRJA AY MBAK b T Uy R G AA AMJ LA MBY A UK GALE
UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.01.28
18:08:18 +0530
3 of 3
::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 03/05/2026 13:13:56 :::