SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3516

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
SMT. NAIKARE KAVITA RAGHUNATH – Appellant
Versus
JANATA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA BY ITS SECRETARY AND ORS – Respondent


2026:BHC-AS:10711 Amberkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2296 OF 2022 Naikare Kavita Raghunath .. Petitioner Versus Janata Shikshan Sanstha & Ors. .. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh a/w. Mr. Bhusham G. Deshmukh, Mr.

Aryan M. Deshmukh, Mr. Aniket Kanawade and Mr. Vaibhav Thorve, Mr. Irvin D'souza and Ms. Karishma Shinde, Advocates for Petitioners.

 Ms. Shraddha Pawar, Advocate i/by Mr. Dilip Bodake for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

 Ms. Vaishali Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent No.3 – State.

...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : MARCH 5, 2026 P. C . :

1. Heard Mr. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Ms. Pawar, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Ms.

Nimbalkar, learned AGP for Respondent No. 3 - State.

2. By consent of both the learned Advocates, Petition is heard finally.

3. Facts in the present case relevant for adjudication of the Petition are under:-

3.1. Petitioner has educational qualification of M.A. (English), M.A. (Politics), First Class and B.Ed. which is essential for teaching procession. Responding to an advertisement by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 on 16.09.2011 Petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top