Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
A. S. Gadkari, Kamal Khata, JJ
Mahadev Dhondiba Marne – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pap entitled to alternate rehabilitation land post-acquisition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. objections trigger inquiries and allotment cancellation reports. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. cancellation order breaches natural justice hearing. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. unverified claims and fraud nullify land allotments. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. lack of verification justifies cancelling petitioner allotment. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. dismiss petition; probe irregularities, allow fresh claim. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
Judgment (Per : Kamal Khata, J) :-
1) By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to quash and set aside the Order dated 4th November, 2025 passed by Respondent No.6 namely the Desk Officer.
Brief facts
2) The Petitioner is a Project Affected Person (PAP). The Petitioner's land namely Gat No.229, 239, 318, 331 admeasuring 00H 6R, 00H 5R and 00H 3R respectively, totaling to 19R, located at Lavharde, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune, was acquired for construction of Temghar Dam Project. The acquisition was done pursuant to an Award dated 13th December, 1999 passed by the Special Land Acquisition O
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
