SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3597

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
A. S. Gadkari, Kamal Khata, JJ
Mahadev Dhondiba Marne – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 16535 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sumit Khaire
For the Respondents: A.I. Patel, A.R. Deolekar

Cancellation of alternate land allotment upheld for non-verification of family members and records; no natural justice breach; government superintendence valid; liberty for fresh eligibility-based application.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition to quash order directing cancellation of alternate land allotment to project affected person - Allotment made without verifying family members on cut-off date or land records - Principles of natural justice not violated as direction based on report part of proceedings - State government empowered to exercise superintendence and issue directions to collector - Order obtained by fraud or misleading information is nullity - Petitioner entitled to fresh application proving eligibility. (Paras 12, 14, 17-19, 24-25)

(B) Relief and Rehabilitation - Alternate land allotment - Must verify acquired land area, family members and records before allotment - Action required against officials for irregularities and persons furnishing incorrect documents. (Paras 18, 20, 25)

Facts of the case:
Land of project affected person acquired for public project pursuant to award; entitled to alternate land with 65% compensation deducted; applied for specific lands which allotted based on claimed thirteen family members; owner and others complained of illegalities; report revealed no verification of records or consents; order directed cancellation of allotments.

Findings of Court:
Cancellation direction upheld; secretary of relief department to investigate irregularities in project allotments and actions against officials; petitioner to face action for misleading; liberty to reapply with documents.

Issues: Whether cancellation order violated natural justice by not hearing petitioner; validity of initial allotment without record verification; scope of government directions to collector.

Ratio Decidendi: Allotment without scrutiny of family size, consents and records on cut-off date invalid; government direction not final but triggers proceedings; fraud renders order null; appellate court upholds where lower process flawed but reapplication allowed.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. pap entitled to alternate rehabilitation land post-acquisition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. objections trigger inquiries and allotment cancellation reports. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. cancellation order breaches natural justice hearing. (Para 11 , 12)
4. unverified claims and fraud nullify land allotments. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. lack of verification justifies cancelling petitioner allotment. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. dismiss petition; probe irregularities, allow fresh claim. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)

Judgment (Per : Kamal Khata, J) :-

1) By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to quash and set aside the Order dated 4th November, 2025 passed by Respondent No.6 namely the Desk Officer.

Brief facts

2) The Petitioner is a Project Affected Person (PAP). The Petitioner's land namely Gat No.229, 239, 318, 331 admeasuring 00H 6R, 00H 5R and 00H 3R respectively, totaling to 19R, located at Lavharde, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune, was acquired for construction of Temghar Dam Project. The acquisition was done pursuant to an Award dated 13th December, 1999 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO).

3) Being a project affected person, the Petitioner is entitled to allotment of an alternate land. In lieu of the allotment of alternate land the SLAO has deducted an amount of 65% from the compensation due to the Petitioner and deposited it in the Treasury. The Petitioner preferred an application for allotment of the alternate land on 25th November, 2019.

4) In view of the non- allotment of the land, the Petitioner made an application on 6th February, 2022, demanding land bearing Gat No.178/2/1 admeasuring 80R, situated at Village Apti, Taluka Khed, District Pune. Since he was not allotted the land as per the application dated 6th February, 2022, he filed two other applications one on 25th November, 2023 seeking allotment of land bearing Gat No.2035/2 admeasuring 40R situated at Pimpalgaon Tarfe, Taluka Khed, District Pune and another application dated 26th April, 2024 for Gat No.358/2 admeasuring 80R situated at Burunjawadi, Taluka Khed, District Pune. The said applications were allowed by an Order dated 6th March, 2024.

5) Upon passing of the Order, Shri Balasaheb Bhausaheb Wable, the owner of land bearing Gat No.358/2 filed an application before the Additional Collector, Pune, seeking cancellation of allotment of land to the Petitioner on 20th August, 2024 on the ground that, his land bearing Gat No. 358/2 admeasuring 81R was acquired for rehabilitation. He further contended that, the name of the Collector was recorded in the 7/12 extract but the land is acquired from the western side. He contended that, on the western side of his house, a well and a bore well were situated and he has been cultivating the land. He referred to an application made on 29th February, 2024 before the Divisional Commissioner for correction of map and an application to the Additional Collector, Pune on 20th August 2024, for cancellation of the allotment to the Petitioner. Mr. Wable contended that, the Petitioner had misled the Government Officer to allot him the land admeasuring 80R and consequently requested for cancellation of the allotment Order dated 6th March, 2024.

6) The Additional Collector conducted a hearing on 11th February 2025 and after hearing both the Petitioner as well as Mr. Wable at length passed an Order dated 12th February, 2025. By the said Order, the direction for acquisition of land bearing Gat No.358/2 was not changed since according to him the land was already allotted to the Petitioner and the possession handed over, consequently, in his view the said issue was beyond his jurisdiction. He accordingly directed the Applicant Mr. Wable to prefer an application before the appropriate Authority.

7) Accordingly, Mr. Wable filed an application before the Ministry of Relief and Rehabilitation of Maharashtra State on 29th March, 2025. The Minis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top