Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Amit Borkar, J
Rashesh Cooperative Housing Society Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual timeline of deemed conveyance application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. society entitled to appurtenant area and recreational share. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. appurtenant area limited to contiguous marginal open spaces. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. issues: appurtenant scope, share formula, rg entitlement. (Para 21) |
| 5. mofa conveyance includes necessary appurtenant land. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. appurtenant encompasses regulatory margins, distinguishes common areas. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 7. plinth from sanctioned plans, not proportionate built-up. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 8. deemed conveyance: 2201.56 sqm exclusive plus rg share. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 65 , 66 , 67) |
JUDGMENT:
1. By the present petition instituted under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has called in question the legality, correctness, and propriety of the judgment and order dated 8 July 2025 passed by respondent No.2 in Application No.379 of 2023.
2. The facts giving rise to the present proceedings, a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
