SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3614

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
G. S. Kulkarni, Aarti Sathe, JJ
University of Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 4389 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V. Raghuraman, Raghvendra C.R, Sriraj Menon, Avesh Ganja, Sandesh Panchal i/b. Satyaki Law Associates
For the Respondents: Jitendra B. Mishra, Saket Ketkar, Ashutosh Mishra, Rupesh Dubey, Jyoti Chavan

Affiliation fees by statutory universities are statutory/regulatory functions, not 'supply of service' in course/furtherance of business under CGST Act Section 7, hence not taxable under Section 9; exempt even if service.

Headnote:(A) CGST Act, 2017 - Sections 2(17), 2(31), 7, 9, 74 - Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 - Chapter X - Affiliation fees collected by statutory university for granting/renewing affiliation to colleges - Such activities are statutory/regulatory functions to disseminate education, involving inspection of infrastructure etc., not commercial or in course/furtherance of business - Not 'supply' under Section 7(1)(a) as no trade, commerce etc.; fees not 'consideration' under Section 2(31) lacking quid pro quo - No levy under Section 9; no jurisdiction for show cause notice/order-in-original - Even assuming service, exempt under Entry 66 Notification No.12/2017-CT(R) as relating to education provided by educational institution. (Paras 20-25, 30)

(B) Exemption Notification No.12/2017-CT(R) dated 28.06.2017 - Entry 66 - Covers services by educational institution to students/faculty/staff or to such institution - University granting affiliation qualifies as educational institution; affiliated colleges' students are university students; affiliation integral to education, examinations, degrees. (Paras 31, 40)

(C) Circulars/Instructions - Cannot override statutory provisions or exemptions; no adjudication needed if levy itself without jurisdiction. (Para 34)

Facts of the case:
Writ petition under Article 226 challenging order-in-original and summary order confirming GST demand with penalty/interest on affiliation fees for financial years 2017-18 to 2022-23; rectification application rejected; also challenging certain circulars/instructions.

Findings of Court:
Impugned orders quashed; no GST on affiliation fees as not 'supply'; activity statutory, not business.

Issues: Whether affiliation fees constitute taxable supply under Sections 7/9 CGST Act; jurisdictional error in demand; applicability of exemption.

Ratio Decidendi: Statutory university's affiliation activities not business/supply lacking commercial element; fees regulatory levies, not consideration; GST destination-based tax on consumption cannot burden education; follows consistent judicial view on non-taxability.

Result: Petition allowed; rule made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b) quashing order-in-original, summary order and rectification order.

Table of Content
1. gst demand on university affiliation fees challenged. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. affiliation fees statutory, not business supply. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. affiliation constitutes taxable supply per respondents. (Para 15 , 16)
4. university act affiliation non-commercial statutory duty. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. sections 7,9 exclude statutory functions from supply. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
6. precedents hold no gst on affiliation fees. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
7. exemptions apply; circulars cannot override law. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
8. orders quashed; petition succeeds. (Para 35 , 36)

Judgment (Per G. S. Kulkarni, J.) :-

1. Rule, made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, heard finally.

2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order-in-original dated 27 January, 2025 along with Summary Order dated 28 January, 2025 issued by respondent no. 2 whereby a Goods and Services Tax (GST) demand amounting to Rs.16,90,05,337/- has been confirmed against the petitioner under the provisions of Section 74(1) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 read with the corresponding provisions of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act, 2017. Also the penalty equivalent to the said amount under the provisions of Section 74(1) read with Section 122 of the CGST Act has been confirmed against the petitioner by the impugned order. The petitioner has also prayed for other reliefs, which are in relation to setting aside of the rectification order dated 23 June, 2025, as also has prayed for quashing of Circular No. 151/07/2021-GST dated 17 June, 2021 issued by Central Board and Indirect Taxes as also instructions dated 5 October, 2018/22 June, 2020 issued by respondent no. 3. The substantive prayers are prayer clauses (a) to (g) of the petition, which are required to be noted, which read thus:

“a) That this Court be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the impugned order in original bearinig No. 154/ADC/MUMSOUTH/VS/2024-25 dated 27.01.2025, along with the summary order dated 28.01.2025 issued by respondent no. 2, enclosed as “Exhibit-A and A1”.

b) That this Court be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quash the Rectification Order bearing No. 01/JC/MUMBAI SOUTH/UM/RECTIFY/2025-26 dated 23.06,2025 issued by respondent no. 3, copy of the rectification order dated 23.06.2025 is enclosed as “Exhibit -B”.

c) That this Court be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the impugned Circular No. 151/07/2021-GST dated 17/06/2021 issued by Central Board and Indirect Taxes – Respondent no. 4, enclosed as “Exhibit-C”.

d) That this Court be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the impugned Circular No. 234/28/2024-GT dated 11.10.2024 issued by Central Board and Indirect Taxes- respondent no. 4, enclosed as “Exhibit-D”.

e) That this Court be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash Para 5.54 and Para 5.55 of Minutes of 54th GST Council Meeting dated 09.09.2024 by respondent no. 5, Copy of the para 5.54 and 5.55 of 54th GST Council Meeting dated 09.09.2024 enclosed as “Exhibit-E”.

f) That this Court be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash Instruction bearing D.O.F. No. CBEC/20/43/01/2017-GST dated 05.10.2018 issued by respondent no. 3, enclosed as “Exhibit-F”.

g) That this Court be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash Instruction vide letter bearing D.O.F. No. CBEC-20/10/07/2019-GST dated 22.6.2020 issued by respondent no. 3, enclosed as “Exhibit-F1”.

3. The relevant facts are required

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top