Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
S. M. MODAK, SANDEEP V. MARNE, JJ
Bhupinder Singh Passi – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. post-superannuation disciplinary initiation timing disputed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. reg 20(3)(iii) needs pre-retirement proceedings start. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. charge-sheet issuance commences disciplinary proceedings. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. reg 20(3)(ii) inapplicable for continuation post-retirement. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. pension reg 48 governs post-retirement recovery. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. quash charge-sheet; permit pension regulation proceedings. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT (PER S. M. MODAK, J.) :-
1. The issues involved in this petition are, ‘Whether disciplinary Digitally signed SEEMA by SEEMA KSHITIJ KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/21 YELKAR D 20 a 2 te 6 : .04.24 enquiry can be initiated under Discipline and Appeal Regulations against an officer, who has retired on superannuation?’ and ‘whether the disciplinary proceedings commence with issuance of a show cause notice or they commence only on issuance of a memorandum of charge-sheet?’.
2. After hearing the submission advanced by both sides, this Court as per order dated 18th April 2018, directed Respondents “not to proceed with disciplinary enquiry further” till the next date. Thereafter for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
