Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M. S. KARNIK, S. M. MODAK, JJ
New Lotus Co-operative Housing Society Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of land reservation history and purchase notice service (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. notice invalid due to improper service, content, and delay (Para 6 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. reservation lapses without acquisition within six months of notice (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. corporation's records confirm notice receipt and proper service (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. composite notice under section 127 valid if requirements met (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. technical objections and laches rejected post-reservation lapse (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. reservation lapsed; land released for permissible development (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT (PER M. S. KARNIK, J.) :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since common issues are involved in these petitions, the same are disposed of by this common order. For convenience, facts of Writ Petition No. 2227 of 2010 are referred.
2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following substantive reliefs.
“a) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order and/or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus thereby directing the Respondents herein to forthwith sto
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
