SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3624

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M. S. KARNIK, S. M. MODAK, JJ
New Lotus Co-operative Housing Society Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.2227 OF 2010 | WRIT PETITION NO.5525 OF 2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Surel Shah, Amey Deshpande, Ganesh Misal, Rohit Chavan, Sunil Dude, Sandesh Darade, Venkatesh Shinde, Vishal Kale
For the Respondents: Neha S. Bhide, G. R. Raghuwanshi, O. A. Chandurkar, Tanu N. Bhatia, Abhijit P. Kulkarni, Sweta Shah

Reservation lapses under Section 127 MRTP Act if no acquisition steps within six months of valid purchase notice, upheld even if composite and receipt confirmed by authority's actions and RTI despite denial.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966 - Section 127 - Lapsing of reservations - Land reserved for high school in development plans sanctioned in 1966 and 1987 - Owner issued purchase notice after acquiring land in 2000 - Notice received on 26/09/2001 as confirmed by RTI responses and authority's correspondence - No steps for acquisition within six months - Subsequent resolutions and proposals post six months ineffective - Composite notice under Sections 37 and 127 valid if Section 127 requirements satisfied - Authority's denial of receipt untenable given own actions towards acquisition - Service on reception forwarded internally sufficient - No delay/laches defeats automatic lapsing by operation of law - Reservation deemed lapsed; land available for permissible development. (Paras 15-22)

Facts of the case:
Petition under Article 226 challenging reservation of land for high school, claiming lapse due to purchase notice under Section 127 served in 2001 with no timely acquisition steps. Authority contested receipt, validity, service and raised delay. Later change to playground reservation also challenged.

Findings of Court:
Purchase notice validly served and received; reservation lapsed on failure to act within six months.

Issues: Validity, service and effect of composite purchase notice under Section 127; impact of authority's post-lapse actions; applicability of delay/laches.

Ratio Decidendi: Requirements of Section 127 notice met despite composite form; authority estopped from denying receipt after acting upon it and confirmed via RTI; lapsing automatic, not defeated by subsequent proceedings or delay in challenge.

Result: Writ petitions allowed; reservation declared lapsed.

Table of Content
1. facts of land reservation history and purchase notice service (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. notice invalid due to improper service, content, and delay (Para 6 , 12 , 13)
3. reservation lapses without acquisition within six months of notice (Para 10 , 11)
4. corporation's records confirm notice receipt and proper service (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. composite notice under section 127 valid if requirements met (Para 17 , 18)
6. technical objections and laches rejected post-reservation lapse (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
7. reservation lapsed; land released for permissible development (Para 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT (PER M. S. KARNIK, J.) :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since common issues are involved in these petitions, the same are disposed of by this common order. For convenience, facts of Writ Petition No. 2227 of 2010 are referred.

2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following substantive reliefs.

“a) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order and/or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus thereby directing the Respondents herein to forthwith stop and cancel all the process and steps being taken by them for acquisition of land admeasuring 1 Hectare 60 Ares from Survey No.40/1 and admeasuring 37 Ares from Survey No.39/1 of Village Karvenagar, earlier known as Hingane (Budruk of District Pune under the provisions of Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966 r/w provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

b) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to hold and declare that the reservation for High School numbered as HS-15 in the sanctioned revised final Development Plan of the Pune Municipal Corporation, which has been published on 5.1.1987 in respect of area admeasuring 1 Hectare and 60 Ares of land from Survey No.40/1 and admeasuring 37 Ares from Survey No.39/1 of Village Karvenagar, earlier known as Hingane (Budruk) of District Pune has elapsed u/s 127 of Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966 on account of failure of Respondent No.2 Pune Municipal Corporation to take steps for acquisition within six months of the date of service of notice dated 18.9.2001 on 26.9.2001 and be further pleased to hold and declare that the said land is available for use in accordance with the user permissible for the adjoining land namely for residential/commercial purpose, as permissible.

c) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ Order and or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing and setting aside Resolution No.1593 dated 10.3.2005 passed by the Standing Committee of the Pune Municipal Corporation being Exhibit "F" to this Writ Petition and the order dated 30.7.2007 passed by the Collector, Pune being Exhibit "I" to this Writ Petition.”

3. The subject matter is a plot of land bearing Survey Nos.39/1 and 40/1 of Village Karvenagar earlier known as Hingane (Budruk) admeasuring 37 Ares and 1 Hector 60 Ares respectively. So far as Writ Petition No. 2227 of 2010 is concerned, the petitioner seeks a declaration that the land is free from reservation and the reservation has lapsed in view of the purchase notice issued by the petitioner under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (‘MRTP Act’ for short) on 18/09/2001 and as no steps having been taken towards acquisition thereof within a period of 6 months from the receipt of the said purchase notice. During the pendency of Writ Petition No. 2227 of 2010, the State Government sanctioned the development plan for Pune City in the year 2013 by which the reservation of the petitioner's land was changed from ‘HS-15’ (High School) to ‘PG- 34’ (Playground). This change in reservation has been challenged in Writ Petition No. 5525 of 2016 as it is the case of the petitioner that the same has been carried out after the reservation lapsed in view of the purchase notice.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top