SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 351162

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
RAJESH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS – Respondent
PIL/100/2024



Digitally signed by RAMESHWAR RAMESHWAR LAXMAN LAXMAN DILWALE DILWALE Date:

2025.09.26 PIL-100-2024 final 26.doc 14:36:44 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.100 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13336 OF 2024 Rajesh Sharma } Age 60 years, of Mumbai, Indian inhabitant } The General Secretary, of Maharashtra } Pradesh Congress Committee, } Residing at 101, C-Wing, Maruti Bhavan } Opp. Sona Udyog, Parsi, Panchayat Road, }

Andheri (East), Mumbai – 400 069 } …. Petitioner V/s

1. State of Maharashtra } Through the Secretary of the } Ministry of Power, having Office at } Mantralaya, Mumbai } 2. Union of India } Through the Secretary of Power, } having its address at Shram Shakti Bhawan, } Raif Marg, New Delhi 110001 and also at } Aaykar Bhavan, 2nd Floor, } Maharshi Karve Road, New Mariine Lines, } Mumbai – 400020 } 3. Maharahtra State Electricity Distribution } Company Limited, having its address at } JSD, Dharamveer Nagar, Mumbai-400080 } 4. Maharahtra Electricity Regulatory } Commission, having its office at } World Trade Cetnre, Centre No.1,13th Floor, } Cuffe Parade, Colaba, Mumbai-400005 }

….Respondents Mr. Nishant Chothani a/w Ms.Sneha Patil & Mr. Hrishikesh Joshi i/b Maniar Srivastava Associates, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl. GP a/w Mrs. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for the respondent no.1.

Mrs. Snehaz V. Bharucha i/b Mr. A.A. Ansari Advocates for the respondent no.2.

Ms. Deepa Chawan, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Saloni Kapadia, Mr. Karan Gandhi i/b Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Advocates for the respondent no.3 - MSEDCL CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ., &

MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

Reserved on : 6th AUGUST 2025.

Pronounced on : 26th SEPTEMBER 2025.

PER, SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ :-

The petitioner seeks to challenge the entire tendering process pursuant to NIT dated 13th March 2024.

2. A Notice Inviting Tender (in short, “NIT”) was issued on 13th March 2024 for power procurement for Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (in short, “MSEDCL”). Under the NIT, a composite bid for 1600 MW thermal power and 5000 MW solar power was to be evaluated through a competitive bidding process. Under the NIT dated 13th March 2024, the bid submission due date was 25th April 2024 and the technical bids were required to be evaluated on the same day one hour after the deadline for submitting the bid. On 30th June 2024, the bidders were intimated through Addendum No.15 that they had an option to opt for composite bid for half of the published capacity, that is, a composite bid of 800 MW thermal power and 2500 MW solar power was also acceptable. In line with this clarification, Corrigendum XI was issued on 8th July 2025 and the date and time for closure of the procurement of tender documents and the last date for submission of the bid were extended to 31st July 2024. In this writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayers:

“ (a) to allow this Public Interest litigation;

(b) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass an order quashing and setting aside the entire the tender process to the issuance of the Tender dated 13.03.2024;

(c) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass an order directing the Respondents to withdraw the Tender dated 13.03.2024;

(d) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass an order restraining the Respondents from acting upon and/or implementing the Tender dated 13.03.2024;

(e) that pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass an order restraining the Respondents from acting upon and/or implementing the Tender dated 13.03.2024 and/or any steps taken in furtherance thereof or pursuant thereto;

(f) any further relief may be granted in favour of the Petitioner in the interest of justice.”

3. The main ground of challenge laid to the NIT dated 13th March 2024 is that the tender process contravenes section 63 of the Electricity Act and violates mandatory guidelines for long-term procurement

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top