IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 13393 OF 2025 M/s. Survee Shidal … Petitioner Digitally s S i H gn R e A d D b D y HA Vs.

SHRADDHAKAMLESH KAMLESH TALEKAR TALEKAR Date: Airports Authority of India .. Respondent

2025.07.01 21:17:43 +0530 Mr. Karl Tamboly a/w. Kevin Pereira and Samiksha Rao i/b Viraj Jadhav, for Petitioner.

Mr. Pravin Samdani, Senior Advocate a/w. Shilpa Kapil, Chidanand Kapil, Chandni Bavishi and Priti Karbhai, for Respondent AAI.

CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

Date : June 23, 2025 Oral Judgement:

1. This is a Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”). The disputes and differences between the parties have arisen in connection with a Concession Agreement dated March 15, 2024 between the Petitioner and the Respondent, Airports Authority of India (“AAI”). The Concession Agreement is scheduled to run for a period of seven years after an initial gestation period of 60 days. It is evident that the Concession Agreement was meant for the Petitioner to run a restaurant / “hang-out” over property at the Juhu Airport, admeasuring app