SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 351286

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
PRAMOD R. MALPANI – Appellant
Versus
SHAM T. PARDESHI AND OTHER – Respondent


ARJUN VITTHAL Arjun KUDHEKAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION KUDHEKAR Date: 2025.08.03 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.267 OF 2010

22:04:35 +0530 Pramod Ramvilas Malpani …Applicant Versus Sham Tuljaram Pardeshi …Respondents (Since deceased through his legal heir)

1A. Anusaya Tuljaram Pardeshi

2. Sanjay Tuljaram Pardeshi _______________________________________________________________ Mr. Surel S. Shah, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Nachiket V. Khaladkar, for the Applicant.

Mr. S. S. Patwardhan i/b Ms. Mrinal A. Shelar, for Respondent No.1A.

_______________________________________________________________

CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 15 APRIL 2025 JUDGMENT:

1. Heard Mr. Surel S. Shah, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr. S. S. Patwardhan, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents.

Challenge:

2. By the present Civil Revision Application the challenge is to the legality and validity of the Order dated 8th December 2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Pune in Regular Civil Appeal No.474 of 2009 (“impugned Order”). By the impugned Order the Appeal filed by the present Respondent No.1 has been allo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top