SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 351290

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M.S. SONAK HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN
VASANTHI HEGDE THROUGH HER POA G. V. NAGARAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY REVENUE AND FOREST DEPT. AND ORS. – Respondent
WP/11594/2017



Sayali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8011 OF 2017 Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2025.03.28

14:44:35 +0530 Vasanthi Hegde, Age : 76 Years, R/at : Chetnahally Estate, Chetnahally Village, Maudigere Taluq, Chikmagalur District 577132.

Through her Constituted Power of Attorney Holder –

G. V. Nagaraj, Age : 40 Years, R/at : 73, 2nd Main, Vittal Nagar (Near ISRO Layout, BESCOM), Bangalore 560078 …Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2. The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Metro Centre No.1, New Panvel, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

3. The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Metro Centre No.3, New Panvel, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

4. Narayan Eknath Gondhali Age : 52 Years, R/at : Bamandongri, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

5. Chandra Ankush Mhatre (Deceased)

Nee Chandrabai Eknath Gondhali Mo. 4 to 6, Residing at Bamandongri, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

5/a) Samadhan Ankush Mhatre

5/b) Sanam Ankush Mhatre Both 5/a & 5/b Residing at, Post Jasai, Taluka Uran, District Raigad.

5/c) Sampada Jagannath Patil Residing at Village Chindhran, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

6. Jomubai Chintaman Patil (Deceased)

Nee Jomubai Eknath Gondhali Mo. 4 to 6 Residing at Bamandongri, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

6/a) Sunil Chintaman Patil

6/b) Rajesh Chintaman Patil Both 6/a & 6/b Residing at, Post Morave, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

6/c) Alka Pradeep Tembhe R/at : Village Chindhran, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9171 OF 2017 Vasanthi Hegde, …Petitioner Age : 76 Years, R/at : Chetnahally Estate, Chetnahally Village, Maudigere Taluq, Chikmagalur District 577132.

Through her Constituted Power of Attorney Holder –

G. V. Nagaraj, Age : 40 Years, R/at : 73, 2nd Main, Vittal Nagar (Near ISRO Layout, BESCOM), Bangalore 560078 Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2. The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Metro Centre No.1, New Panvel, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

3. The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Metro Centre No.3, New Panvel, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

4. Tukaram Hari Naik

5. Jana Hari Naik

6. Premnath Savlaram Naik 7. Janardan Savlaram Naik All Residing at Bamandongri, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11594 OF 2017 Vasanthi Hegde, Age : 76 Years, R/at : Chetnahally Estate, Chetnahally Village, Maudigere Taluq, Chikmagalur District 577132.

Through her Constituted Power of Attorney Holder –

G. V. Nagaraj, Age : 40 Years, R/at : 73, 2nd Main, Vittal Nagar (Near ISRO Layout, BESCOM), Bangalore 560078 …Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2. The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Metro Centre No.1, New Panvel, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

3. The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Metro Centre No.3, New Panvel, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad.

4. Kana Sitaram Gondhali Age : 63 Years, R/at : Bamandongri, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad. …Respondents ______________________________________________________ Mr Sachin Punde a/w Ms Deepa S. Punde, for Petitioner in all the Petitions.

Mr A. I. Patel, Addl. G. P. a/w Ms M. S. Bane, A.G.P., for Respondent-State in all the Petitions.

Mr. H. G. Wakshe, for Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in WP/8011/2017.

______________________________________________________

CORAM: M.S. Sonak &

Jitendra Jain, JJ.

RESERVED ON: 27 March 2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 28 March 2025 JUDGMENT ( P er M. S. Sonak, J .)

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned Counsel for the parties agree that a common judgment and order can dispose of these Petitions. They submit that Writ Petition No. 8011 of 2017 may be treated as the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top