SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 351312

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
PANDURANG PUNJA AVHAD – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR THE AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF INDIA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.12676 OF 2024 Pandurang Punja Avhad Age 70 years, Residing at – Devendra Niwas, S-10/3, Sr. No.94/95, Indranagari, Opp. Rahul Residency, Kothrud, Pune – 411 038. ....Petitioner V/S Director, The Automotive Research Association of India, Sr.No.102, Vetal Tekdi, Aside of Karve Road, Kothrud, Pune – 411 038. ....Respondent _________

Mr. Nitin A. Kulkarni for the Petitioner.

Mr. Avinash Jalisatgi with Mr. Varun Joshi, Mr. Chetan Alai and Ms. Divya Wadekar for Respondent.

__________

CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. RESERVED ON : 27 FEBRUARY 2025. PRONOUNCED ON : 10 MARCH 2025.

J U D G M E N T :

1) The pivotal issue that arises for consideration in the present Petition is whether the Appropriate Government in respect of the Respondent-Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) is Central or State Government. If it is held that the Appropriate Government for Respondent-ARAI is the State Government, the next issue for consideration is whether Petitioner fits into the definition of a term ‘workman’ within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act). If the Petitioner is able to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top