Digitally signed by ARUNA ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date:

2025.03.04

11:23:24 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 77 OF 2022 Smt. Anjali Anand Khare. … Petitioner.

Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents.

****

Mr. A.V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Yash Agarwal, i/b. Mr.

Vaibhav Kulkarni, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rajendra Anbhule a/w. Ms. Nisha Ahire, Ms. Pooja Pal, for Respondent No. 4.

Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for Respondent/State.

****

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

DATE : 27^th FEBRUARY, 2025 JUDGMENT (Per RAVINDRA V GHUGE,J)

1. Leave to add prayer clause (d-1) with regard to the claim for pension. Addition be carried out forthwith.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.

3. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that since the Petitioner would superannuate in March, 2025, prayer clause (d) will not be pressed. The learned Senior Advocate on instructions submits that the Petitioner is now concerned with the Pension since she would be helpless after superannuation if the pension is not paid. All other issues are not significant for her