HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
IN REF ORDER DT. 29 DECEMBER 2025 PASSED BY THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER BRIHANMUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER BMC CUM DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER AND ORS – Respondent
SMWP/4/2025
##PAGE1##
Suo moto WP-4-2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally
signed by
BALAJI
B GA OL VA INJI DRAOG PAO NV CIN HD AR LAO SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION NO. 4 OF 2025
PANCHAL Date:
2025.12.31
14:08:27
+0530
In Re : Order dated 29th December 2025 passed by the Municipal
Commissioner, Brihanmumbai.
Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the State.
Ms. Komal Punjabi a/w Mr. Joel Carlos, Advocate for the BMC.
Mr. Sachindra Shetye, Advocate for State Election Commission.
Mr. Suryakrishnamurthy, Officer of State Election Commission.
Mr. Suresh Kakani, Secretary, State Election Commission,
Maharashtra.
Mr. Vinod R. Patil, In-Charge Chief Judicial Magistrate, Esplanade,
Mumbai.
CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ &
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J
DATE : 30th DECEMBER 2025.
(The Court is convened at the residence of Hon’ble the Chief Justice
of Bombay High Court.)
P.C. :
This Court has been convened in view of the urgency in the
matter when the records were produced by the Registry before one of
us (Chief Justice) in the afternoon.
2. Accordingly, necessary instructions were issued for intimating
the learned Advocate General, the learned counsels for the State
Election Commission, BMC and Election Commission of India about
sitting of the Court at 08:00 p.m. today.
3. The Registrar was informed that the learned Advocate General
is travelling and in his place Ms. Jyoti Chavan, the learned
1/6
Panchal
##PAGE2##Suo moto WP-4-2025.doc
Additional Govt. Pleader appeared for the State of Maharashtra.
4. When this Court assembled at around 08:00 p.m., Ms. Komal
Punjabi, the learned counsel for the BMC sought a brief
adjournment for seeking instructions in the matter.
5. It was on 16th September 2008 that a decision was taken in
the meeting of the Administrative Judges’ Committee of the High
Court of Bombay that the staff of the High Court and the
subordinate Courts is exempted from the election duty. It was
further resolved and decided in the said meeting of the
Administrative Judges’ Committee that no information regarding the
staff of the subordinate Court, if sought from the Principal Judge,
City Civil and Sessions Court Bombay shall be provided to any
authority. Under Article 235 of the Constitution of India, the High
Court exercises complete control and superintendence over the
subordinate Courts including the staff. It was in the light of the
Consitutional provisions pertaining to the High Court under
Chapter V and subordinate Courts under Chapter VI that the
aforementioned decision seems to have been taken by the
Administrative Judges’ Committee on 16th September 2008.
6. The State Election Commission constituted under Article
243-K, may request the Governor of State to make available to the
State Election Commission such staff as may be necessary for the
discharge of functions conferred on the State Election Commission
under Clauses (1) and (2) of Article 243K. Clause (4) provides that
the Legislature of the State may by law make provision for all
matters relating to or in connection with elections to the Panchayats
(in this case Municipalities). Under Article 243 ZA, the
superintendence and control of the preparation of electoral rolls for
and the conduct of all the elections to the Municipalities shall be
2/6
Panchal
##PAGE3##Suo moto WP-4-2025.doc
vested in the State Election Commission referred to under Article
243K. Clause (2) further provides that the Legislaure of the State
may by law make provision with respect to all matters relating to or
in connection with elections to the Municipalities. We may further
refer to Section 159 of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951
captioned as “staff of certain authorities to be made available for
election work”. Section 159 provides that the authorities specified in
sub-section (2) shall when so requested by a Regional Commissioner
appointed under Clause (4) of Article 324 or the Chief Electoral
Officer of the State, make available to any Returning Officer such
staff as may be necessary for the performance of any duties in
connection
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.