HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Sandeep V. Marne, J
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Larsen & Toubro Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. unsuccessful party may seek section 9 relief post-award. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contract delay led to ld and bank guarantee disputes. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. petitioner challenges award errors and seeks bg extension. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. respondent contests maintainability due to delay and estoppel. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. net award favors respondent over petitioner. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. home care allows unsuccessful parties section 9 relief in rare cases. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. petition maintainable; higher threshold for interim relief. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. bg secures petitioner's ld claim against set-off. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. rare compelling case justifies non-prejudicial bg renewal. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 10. order directs bg extension pending section 34. (Para 50 , 51) |
JUDGMENT:
PREFACE
1) This is a post Award Petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) seeking a direction to the Respondent to extend and to keep alive the Bank Guarantee provided by Respondent to the Petitioner towards liquidated damages as per clauses



Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.